Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36471 - 36480 of 63360 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 36471 - 36480 of 63360 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
City of Milwaukee v. Michael A. Bell
acquittal of the companion charge of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated; (2) denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16040 - 2017-09-21
acquittal of the companion charge of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated; (2) denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16040 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 38
Regulation filed a Notice of Motion and Motion to Enforce Disciplinary Order and a Memorandum in support
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=861368 - 2024-10-10
Regulation filed a Notice of Motion and Motion to Enforce Disciplinary Order and a Memorandum in support
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=861368 - 2024-10-10
[PDF]
Gaylene Schwalen v. James E. Howey
subsequently brought a motion to increase child support, and that motion was denied on February 9, 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2669 - 2017-09-19
subsequently brought a motion to increase child support, and that motion was denied on February 9, 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2669 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Harvest Savings Bank v. ROI Investments
, in relevant part: No. 98-2320 3 NOW THEREFORE, upon the motion of the attorneys
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14374 - 2014-09-15
, in relevant part: No. 98-2320 3 NOW THEREFORE, upon the motion of the attorneys
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14374 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Marc Norfleet
. §§ 961.16(2)(b)1 and 961.41(1m)(cm)4. ¶3 On August 18, 2000, defense counsel filed a Motion and Demand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3991 - 2017-09-20
. §§ 961.16(2)(b)1 and 961.41(1m)(cm)4. ¶3 On August 18, 2000, defense counsel filed a Motion and Demand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3991 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
of obstructing an officer. He also appeals an order denying a motion for postconviction relief.[1] Deramus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42030 - 2009-10-13
of obstructing an officer. He also appeals an order denying a motion for postconviction relief.[1] Deramus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42030 - 2009-10-13
COURT OF APPEALS
a “Motion for Turn Over of Property Belonging to Milwaukee Chimney Roof, Inc.” (some formatting altered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134596 - 2015-02-09
a “Motion for Turn Over of Property Belonging to Milwaukee Chimney Roof, Inc.” (some formatting altered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134596 - 2015-02-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. He also appeals the order of the trial court denying his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=333335 - 2021-02-09
. He also appeals the order of the trial court denying his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=333335 - 2021-02-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
children, Ma. W. and D.T. She also appeals from the order denying her motion for postdispositional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192711 - 2017-09-21
children, Ma. W. and D.T. She also appeals from the order denying her motion for postdispositional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192711 - 2017-09-21
Marjorie Leonard v. Judy R. Cattahach
motion for an enlargement of time, and struck the answer. Finally, DuPont argues that, even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11654 - 2005-03-31
motion for an enlargement of time, and struck the answer. Finally, DuPont argues that, even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11654 - 2005-03-31