Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36471 - 36480 of 97585 for court records search online.
Search results 36471 - 36480 of 97585 for court records search online.
[PDF]
State v. Jay Warren Downs
was the trial court asked to define “substantially probable.” Thus, the record supplies no basis to conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14434 - 2017-09-21
was the trial court asked to define “substantially probable.” Thus, the record supplies no basis to conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14434 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon this court’s independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, counsel’s report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=725101 - 2023-11-07
. Upon this court’s independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, counsel’s report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=725101 - 2023-11-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
appears in the circuit court record. She also asserts that she instructed her appointed counsel to file
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=984145 - 2025-07-17
appears in the circuit court record. She also asserts that she instructed her appointed counsel to file
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=984145 - 2025-07-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
appears in the circuit court record. She also asserts that she instructed her appointed counsel to file
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=984145 - 2025-07-17
appears in the circuit court record. She also asserts that she instructed her appointed counsel to file
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=984145 - 2025-07-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
has not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=315680 - 2020-12-22
has not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=315680 - 2020-12-22
Kathryn Jalas Franke v. Martin T. Franke
of the arbitration record instead of the date of divorce. (4) The circuit court did not erroneously exercise its
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16575 - 2005-03-31
of the arbitration record instead of the date of divorce. (4) The circuit court did not erroneously exercise its
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16575 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Kathryn Jalas Franke v. Martin T. Franke
of the closing of the arbitration record instead of the date of divorce. (4) The circuit court did
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16575 - 2017-09-21
of the closing of the arbitration record instead of the date of divorce. (4) The circuit court did
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16575 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
phone calls from the jail would be recorded. The trial court also referenced Husslein’s “terrible
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140363 - 2017-09-21
phone calls from the jail would be recorded. The trial court also referenced Husslein’s “terrible
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140363 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record into account, the circuit court found that Brown “knew exactly what he was pleading
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=362235 - 2021-05-05
of the record into account, the circuit court found that Brown “knew exactly what he was pleading
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=362235 - 2021-05-05
Earl Johnson v. Jon E. Litscher
2001 WI App 47 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2655 - 2005-03-31
2001 WI App 47 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2655 - 2005-03-31