Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36481 - 36490 of 59281 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 36481 - 36490 of 59281 for SMALL CLAIMS.
COURT OF APPEALS
the efficient administration of justice.”). ¶17 As for Strong’s assertion of innocence, “[a] claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89893 - 2012-11-29
the efficient administration of justice.”). ¶17 As for Strong’s assertion of innocence, “[a] claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89893 - 2012-11-29
[PDF]
State v. Roger M. Smejkal
McCleary v. State, 49 Wis. 2d 263, 275, 182 N.W.2d 512 (1971), Smejkal claims a maximum sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6600 - 2017-09-19
McCleary v. State, 49 Wis. 2d 263, 275, 182 N.W.2d 512 (1971), Smejkal claims a maximum sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6600 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Otto Radke v. Plantation Village Limited Partnership
of its interest payments. Radke moved for summary judgment on its claim for the unpaid balance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10634 - 2017-09-20
of its interest payments. Radke moved for summary judgment on its claim for the unpaid balance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10634 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
also claimed that one of the qualified domestic relations orders entered after the divorce judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246148 - 2019-09-04
also claimed that one of the qualified domestic relations orders entered after the divorce judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246148 - 2019-09-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, 2006 WI 100, ¶35, 293 Wis. 2d 594, 716 N.W.2d 906. There is no arguable merit to a claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=616597 - 2023-01-31
, 2006 WI 100, ¶35, 293 Wis. 2d 594, 716 N.W.2d 906. There is no arguable merit to a claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=616597 - 2023-01-31
[PDF]
Brian Mau v. Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund
a negligence claim grounded on the doctrine of res ipsa loquitor at that early stage of proceedings simply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4881 - 2017-09-19
a negligence claim grounded on the doctrine of res ipsa loquitor at that early stage of proceedings simply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4881 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
and that the prosecution could not establish the change of custody of the original videotape. He claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52742 - 2014-09-15
and that the prosecution could not establish the change of custody of the original videotape. He claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52742 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Edwin D. Moehagen v. City of Chippewa Falls
their claim as time-barred by a forty-day statute of limitations. The Moehagens assert that the City’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15314 - 2017-09-21
their claim as time-barred by a forty-day statute of limitations. The Moehagens assert that the City’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15314 - 2017-09-21
State v. Cedric Brown, Sr.
as applied to him.[5] He claims that classifying him as a sex offender when he was convicted of an offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6627 - 2005-03-31
as applied to him.[5] He claims that classifying him as a sex offender when he was convicted of an offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6627 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
was ineffective for failing to expose Ward’s three prior convictions, which Cross claims would have also shown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32678 - 2008-05-12
was ineffective for failing to expose Ward’s three prior convictions, which Cross claims would have also shown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32678 - 2008-05-12