Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36491 - 36500 of 64755 for b's.
Search results 36491 - 36500 of 64755 for b's.
State v. Paul Wozniak
to the PSI information was prejudicial. B. Expert Testimony Wozniak argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11773 - 2005-03-31
to the PSI information was prejudicial. B. Expert Testimony Wozniak argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11773 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“[b]ecause there was no stated rationale for the [circuit] court’s decision and because the County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=721953 - 2023-11-01
“[b]ecause there was no stated rationale for the [circuit] court’s decision and because the County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=721953 - 2023-11-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
): (a) The individual has a primary need for residential care and custody. (b) The individual is a minor who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=946179 - 2025-04-24
): (a) The individual has a primary need for residential care and custody. (b) The individual is a minor who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=946179 - 2025-04-24
[PDF]
State v. Sarah E. Johnson
enter a guilty plea to the charge of disposing evidence, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 946.47(1)(b),1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3583 - 2017-09-19
enter a guilty plea to the charge of disposing evidence, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 946.47(1)(b),1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3583 - 2017-09-19
Greendale Education Assocation v. Greendale School District
809.23(1)(b)5. [1] All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 1999‑2000 version unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4651 - 2005-03-31
809.23(1)(b)5. [1] All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 1999‑2000 version unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4651 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of veracity. See id. B. The citizen informant’s basis of knowledge was sufficiently reliable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88998 - 2012-11-05
of veracity. See id. B. The citizen informant’s basis of knowledge was sufficiently reliable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88998 - 2012-11-05
[PDF]
State v. Andre L. Avery
responds that "[b]ecause a single trial to multiple juries provides the individual defendants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11530 - 2017-09-19
responds that "[b]ecause a single trial to multiple juries provides the individual defendants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11530 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
omitted.)). No. 2023AP440 8 B. The trial court properly exercised its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=756250 - 2024-01-30
omitted.)). No. 2023AP440 8 B. The trial court properly exercised its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=756250 - 2024-01-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
; however, “[b]lood constitutes a limited exception to the foregoing rule.” Bohling, 173 Wis. 2d at 537
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134270 - 2017-09-21
; however, “[b]lood constitutes a limited exception to the foregoing rule.” Bohling, 173 Wis. 2d at 537
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134270 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and called J.E.P. six times telling her not to come to court and to get the case dropped. B. Forfeiture
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=597189 - 2022-12-06
and called J.E.P. six times telling her not to come to court and to get the case dropped. B. Forfeiture
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=597189 - 2022-12-06