Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36491 - 36500 of 82613 for case codes/1000.
Search results 36491 - 36500 of 82613 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. It is therefore necessary for this court to sua sponte extend the deadline for a decision in this case. See WIS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182782 - 2017-09-21
. It is therefore necessary for this court to sua sponte extend the deadline for a decision in this case. See WIS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182782 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112478 - 2014-05-12
review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112478 - 2014-05-12
[PDF]
Rebecca J. Atwood v. Robert E. Atwood
, used for pre-retirement personal objectives. Robert argues that the court erred because cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12927 - 2017-09-21
, used for pre-retirement personal objectives. Robert argues that the court erred because cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12927 - 2017-09-21
State v. Debbie A. Ramos
shirt was not discovered until the third day of the State’s case-in-chief. See id., slip op. at 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11448 - 2005-03-31
shirt was not discovered until the third day of the State’s case-in-chief. See id., slip op. at 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11448 - 2005-03-31
State v. Henry A. Phillips
the circumstances in this case, Phillips' admission was sufficient. Therefore, this court affirms the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13887 - 2005-03-31
the circumstances in this case, Phillips' admission was sufficient. Therefore, this court affirms the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13887 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 On April 29, 1996, Jones pled guilty, in two cases, to a total of three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28502 - 2014-09-15
, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 On April 29, 1996, Jones pled guilty, in two cases, to a total of three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28502 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Daniel Slaughter
. Slaughter raises three issues. First, as in his previous appeal in this case, he claims the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13622 - 2017-09-21
. Slaughter raises three issues. First, as in his previous appeal in this case, he claims the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13622 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
on Obriecht’s future ability to file cases as a sanction for filing a frivolous appeal. We agree the present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31175 - 2014-09-15
on Obriecht’s future ability to file cases as a sanction for filing a frivolous appeal. We agree the present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31175 - 2014-09-15
State v. Joshua Jenkins
not been stopped. ¶9 The threshold issue in this case is whether, under the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15367 - 2005-03-31
not been stopped. ¶9 The threshold issue in this case is whether, under the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15367 - 2005-03-31
State v. Leroy W. Senn
) the trial court erred by denying Senn’s motion to dismiss at the conclusion of the State’s case; and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3472 - 2005-03-31
) the trial court erred by denying Senn’s motion to dismiss at the conclusion of the State’s case; and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3472 - 2005-03-31