Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36491 - 36500 of 62048 for child support.
Search results 36491 - 36500 of 62048 for child support.
[PDF]
State v. Deshawn L. Harris
presents case law that he suggests supports his contention that testimony on Robinson’s alleged prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11432 - 2017-09-19
presents case law that he suggests supports his contention that testimony on Robinson’s alleged prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11432 - 2017-09-19
State v. Dorian V. Neal
(1983). We conclude that the facts and the law support counsel’s assessment of the issues relating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15878 - 2005-03-31
(1983). We conclude that the facts and the law support counsel’s assessment of the issues relating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15878 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Village of Tigerton v. Donald Minniecheske
of the evidence to support an injunction or the validity of the scope of the restriction on their right to file
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11071 - 2017-09-19
of the evidence to support an injunction or the validity of the scope of the restriction on their right to file
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11071 - 2017-09-19
State v. Thomas M. Brearley
to support his arrest. His argument focuses on the field sobriety tests, and he points to certain portions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11533 - 2005-03-31
to support his arrest. His argument focuses on the field sobriety tests, and he points to certain portions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11533 - 2005-03-31
State v. Richard J. Anthuber
of the necessity defense. The basic theory supporting it is that a person should not be punished for violating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9068 - 2005-03-31
of the necessity defense. The basic theory supporting it is that a person should not be punished for violating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9068 - 2005-03-31
State v. John Yang
cannot stand. The State’s only argument, that the evidence was sufficient to support a jury finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4649 - 2005-03-31
cannot stand. The State’s only argument, that the evidence was sufficient to support a jury finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4649 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. The Heurings argue the undisputed facts do not support immunity. We disagree. ¶9 The first element
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49918 - 2010-05-10
. The Heurings argue the undisputed facts do not support immunity. We disagree. ¶9 The first element
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49918 - 2010-05-10
[PDF]
State v. Timothy J. Helm
(1969), in support of his contention that the circuit court’s final sentence violated his due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4361 - 2017-09-19
(1969), in support of his contention that the circuit court’s final sentence violated his due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4361 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Rick Winter
factual allegations in the criminal complaint to support a finding of probable cause that he committed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10269 - 2017-09-20
factual allegations in the criminal complaint to support a finding of probable cause that he committed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10269 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Having reviewed the cases cited by the plaintiffs, we are not convinced that they persuasively support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1028936 - 2025-10-28
Having reviewed the cases cited by the plaintiffs, we are not convinced that they persuasively support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1028936 - 2025-10-28