Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36491 - 36500 of 64027 for records/1000.

COURT OF APPEALS
, but attaches medical records documenting his diagnosis, treatment and positive results from that treatment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52529 - 2010-07-26

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, ¶9, 291 Wis. 2d 179, 717 N.W.2d 1. On this record, we cannot say there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=178968 - 2017-09-21

State v. Daniel Goodremote II
evidence. The record shows that the trial court carefully inquired about the potential prejudice. Its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12568 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Danny R. Mays
successful.” The record reveals that the trial court appropriately considered the aggravated nature
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10124 - 2017-09-19

Gary L. Janz v. Mark Ferkey
in the recorded document are to apply. ¶7 That an ambiguity is created when the language
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21066 - 2006-01-25

COURT OF APPEALS
recalled five months earlier but the county records had not been updated. The court observed that “[w]hen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44070 - 2009-11-30

COURT OF APPEALS
court must “search the record to support the conclusion reached by the fact finder.” [This] rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91562 - 2013-01-14

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the order denying his postconviction motion for relief. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=613414 - 2023-01-24

COURT OF APPEALS
otherwise noted. [2] We note that Nirmaier failed to provide citations to the record in his statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75739 - 2011-12-27

COURT OF APPEALS
memorandum decision demonstrates the court considered statutory factors. We cannot discern from the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55724 - 2010-10-18