Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3651 - 3660 of 63732 for Motion for joint custody.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. No. 2020AP373-CRNM 2 awarded Lanier-Cotton reflected the entirety of the days that he spent in custody
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=345950 - 2021-03-11

[PDF] CA Blank Order
meritorious claim for an additional ten days of credit for time he spent in custody before sentencing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257332 - 2020-04-08

State v. Daniel D. Brown
motion. The issues relate to whether certain statements by Brown should be suppressed, whether the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2490 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
into police custody in September 2012 and was charged in connection with the fire. He was convicted, after
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165703 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
concluding that the circuit court applied the wrong burden of proof when resolving Cole’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57655 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, consistent with the parties’ joint recommendation. 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=286368 - 2020-09-10

[PDF] CA Blank Order
followed the joint sentencing recommendation. The court granted Dutcher 104 days of sentence credit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=601151 - 2022-12-15

[PDF] State v. Dawn M. Filtz
with a prohibited alcohol concentration, contrary to § 346.63(1)(b). Filtz filed a motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7288 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to consider the motion and found that the 911 calls were admissible as present sense impressions and excited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=969905 - 2025-06-17

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
violated the Fifth Amendment by “interrogating” him while he was “in custody” without first providing him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=512646 - 2022-04-21