Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3651 - 3660 of 98491 for court records search online.
Search results 3651 - 3660 of 98491 for court records search online.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and that asking for all records is “overly broad.” The court also found that the testimony of all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239115 - 2019-04-16
, and that asking for all records is “overly broad.” The court also found that the testimony of all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239115 - 2019-04-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the evidence, arguing that the agent did not have reasonable grounds for the search. The circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158092 - 2017-09-21
the evidence, arguing that the agent did not have reasonable grounds for the search. The circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158092 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the search was valid under Act 79. Euell subsequently pled guilty. The circuit court accepted Euell’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256700 - 2020-03-17
that the search was valid under Act 79. Euell subsequently pled guilty. The circuit court accepted Euell’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256700 - 2020-03-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 3, 2016 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160559 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 3, 2016 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160559 - 2017-09-21
2006 WI APP 263
.” Ibid. Thus, an appellate court must “search the record to support the conclusion reached by the fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27272 - 2006-12-19
.” Ibid. Thus, an appellate court must “search the record to support the conclusion reached by the fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27272 - 2006-12-19
[PDF]
WI APP 263
, an appellate court must “search the record to support the conclusion reached by the fact finder.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27272 - 2014-09-15
, an appellate court must “search the record to support the conclusion reached by the fact finder.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27272 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 3, 2021 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=341204 - 2021-03-03
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 3, 2021 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=341204 - 2021-03-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court is not limited to examination of the suppression hearing record. It may also examine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=604935 - 2022-12-29
court is not limited to examination of the suppression hearing record. It may also examine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=604935 - 2022-12-29
[PDF]
Frontsheet
2022 WI 4 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2020AP520 COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=478152 - 2022-03-31
2022 WI 4 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2020AP520 COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=478152 - 2022-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to the warrant-issuing court’s finding is “limited to the record established before the court at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32971 - 2008-06-09
to the warrant-issuing court’s finding is “limited to the record established before the court at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32971 - 2008-06-09