Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36501 - 36510 of 83395 for simple case search.
Search results 36501 - 36510 of 83395 for simple case search.
[PDF]
State v. Timothy R. Pamonicutt
are affirmed. No. 96-0698-CR -2- The procedure in this case is undisputed. As part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10513 - 2017-09-20
are affirmed. No. 96-0698-CR -2- The procedure in this case is undisputed. As part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10513 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=725943 - 2023-11-09
reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=725943 - 2023-11-09
State v. Terri L. Boortz
in criminal cases. County of Ozaukee v. Quelle, 198 Wis.2d 269, 275, 542 N.W.2d 196, 198 (Ct. App. 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12690 - 2005-03-31
in criminal cases. County of Ozaukee v. Quelle, 198 Wis.2d 269, 275, 542 N.W.2d 196, 198 (Ct. App. 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12690 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
no-contest pleas to the burglary as a repeater count in this case and two counts of misdemeanor retail
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254999 - 2020-02-25
no-contest pleas to the burglary as a repeater count in this case and two counts of misdemeanor retail
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254999 - 2020-02-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
entered a guilty plea to a misdemeanor charge of obstructing an officer in Brown County case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=498428 - 2022-03-22
entered a guilty plea to a misdemeanor charge of obstructing an officer in Brown County case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=498428 - 2022-03-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is unconstitutional. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=442352 - 2021-10-20
is unconstitutional. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=442352 - 2021-10-20
COURT OF APPEALS
of this case is as follows. Ardell was cited for speeding on March 29, 2012, with an appearance date of April
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93994 - 2013-03-12
of this case is as follows. Ardell was cited for speeding on March 29, 2012, with an appearance date of April
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93994 - 2013-03-12
CA Blank Order
, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103112 - 2013-10-14
, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103112 - 2013-10-14
[PDF]
General Casualty Company of Wisconsin v. Donald A. Hills
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 95-2261 Complete Title of Case: General
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17053 - 2017-09-21
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 95-2261 Complete Title of Case: General
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17053 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
are not relevant to this case because in his report, Dr. Weinraub acknowledges that the record shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=448189 - 2021-11-02
are not relevant to this case because in his report, Dr. Weinraub acknowledges that the record shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=448189 - 2021-11-02