Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36511 - 36520 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
Search results 36511 - 36520 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for relief. Upon review, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case has been before this court multiple times
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=315702 - 2020-12-22
for relief. Upon review, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case has been before this court multiple times
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=315702 - 2020-12-22
Frontsheet
2012 WI 123 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2012AP1654-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90800 - 2012-12-17
2012 WI 123 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2012AP1654-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90800 - 2012-12-17
[PDF]
NOTICE
and explainable basis” with “delineation of the primary sentencing factors to the particular facts of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26957 - 2014-09-15
and explainable basis” with “delineation of the primary sentencing factors to the particular facts of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26957 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
case,” and thus, “remains within the trial court’s discretion.” Id. at 740. ¶5 Immediately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42188 - 2009-10-13
case,” and thus, “remains within the trial court’s discretion.” Id. at 740. ¶5 Immediately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42188 - 2009-10-13
[PDF]
State v. Matthew S. Olsen
to go through the case with you and look at the weaknesses of the case? [Olsen]: No. [Prosecutor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25922 - 2017-09-21
to go through the case with you and look at the weaknesses of the case? [Olsen]: No. [Prosecutor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25922 - 2017-09-21
Mark Cimbalnik v. Patricia Guy
paid the jury fee. Before adjourning the case, however, the trial court heard the respective positions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7379 - 2005-03-31
paid the jury fee. Before adjourning the case, however, the trial court heard the respective positions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7379 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117960 - 2014-09-15
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117960 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition and affirm. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1) (2011- 12).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95945 - 2014-09-15
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition and affirm. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1) (2011- 12).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95945 - 2014-09-15
State v. Janice D.
attorney brings two cases to the court’s attention that appear to conflict with one another regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6781 - 2005-03-31
attorney brings two cases to the court’s attention that appear to conflict with one another regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6781 - 2005-03-31
Patricia A. Charette v. State
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8353 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8353 - 2005-03-31