Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36511 - 36520 of 64056 for records/1000.
Search results 36511 - 36520 of 64056 for records/1000.
[PDF]
NOTICE
reasons, the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled to relief. Nelson v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31176 - 2014-09-15
reasons, the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled to relief. Nelson v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31176 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
either plea withdrawal or resentencing. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=769887 - 2024-02-28
either plea withdrawal or resentencing. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=769887 - 2024-02-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
considering the no-merit report and the response, and after conducting an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242940 - 2019-06-26
considering the no-merit report and the response, and after conducting an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242940 - 2019-06-26
[PDF]
James Robleski v. C.R. Meyer and Sons Company
was commenced. Nothing in the record supports that allegation. A September 10, 1992, letter identifies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14182 - 2014-09-15
was commenced. Nothing in the record supports that allegation. A September 10, 1992, letter identifies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14182 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
findings of fact, we search the record for reasons to sustain the circuit court’s discretionary decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31243 - 2007-12-17
findings of fact, we search the record for reasons to sustain the circuit court’s discretionary decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31243 - 2007-12-17
State v. John G. Anderson
to testify at trial is premised on a factual assertion that is not supported by the record. The record shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16301 - 2005-03-31
to testify at trial is premised on a factual assertion that is not supported by the record. The record shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16301 - 2005-03-31
Harry Bruce Pomeroy v. Jennifer Ann Pomeroy
decision based on the application of the correct legal standards to the facts of record. Id. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26289 - 2006-08-23
decision based on the application of the correct legal standards to the facts of record. Id. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26289 - 2006-08-23
Susan H. H. by her guardian Western Wisconsin Guardian Services v. Brandon A. H.
was irretrievably broken was supported by the record and was not clearly erroneous. ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2728 - 2005-03-31
was irretrievably broken was supported by the record and was not clearly erroneous. ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2728 - 2005-03-31
State v. Tong T.
for having two other counts dismissed and read into the record. The charge arose out of allegations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5687 - 2005-03-31
for having two other counts dismissed and read into the record. The charge arose out of allegations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5687 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the remaining amount of the forfeiture. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135204 - 2017-09-21
the remaining amount of the forfeiture. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135204 - 2017-09-21