Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36531 - 36540 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 36531 - 36540 of 58492 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
abuse against Yvonne. The parties’ second divorce was commenced in 2013 and following a trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173782 - 2017-09-21
abuse against Yvonne. The parties’ second divorce was commenced in 2013 and following a trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173782 - 2017-09-21
State v. Mark Alan Szarkowitz
pro se motion, labeled “Motion to Correct Illegal Sentence.” The trial court construed this motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6163 - 2005-03-31
pro se motion, labeled “Motion to Correct Illegal Sentence.” The trial court construed this motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6163 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
an altercation at a bar with John Twetten in which Lounsbury was injured. The trial was to the court. After
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45138 - 2009-12-29
an altercation at a bar with John Twetten in which Lounsbury was injured. The trial was to the court. After
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45138 - 2009-12-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
no-merit report does not address whether the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174917 - 2017-09-21
no-merit report does not address whether the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174917 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the father’s parental rights is not the subject of this appeal. 4 At trial, Jessica testified that she
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146395 - 2017-09-21
of the father’s parental rights is not the subject of this appeal. 4 At trial, Jessica testified that she
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146395 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
/Development Agreement signed by Post.[2] Pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 788.03, trial to the court was had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54833 - 2010-09-28
/Development Agreement signed by Post.[2] Pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 788.03, trial to the court was had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54833 - 2010-09-28
[PDF]
Milwaukee Insurance Company v. Randy Krueger
the record discloses no dispute of material fact, and because the trial court correctly decided that absent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11820 - 2017-09-21
the record discloses no dispute of material fact, and because the trial court correctly decided that absent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11820 - 2017-09-21
State v. James H. Bartz
challenges the trial court’s finding that Bartz refused to submit to the requested testing. Contrary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14329 - 2005-10-07
challenges the trial court’s finding that Bartz refused to submit to the requested testing. Contrary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14329 - 2005-10-07
[PDF]
NOTICE
held a hearing on the motion at which it heard testimony from Paris and his trial counsel. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36405 - 2014-09-15
held a hearing on the motion at which it heard testimony from Paris and his trial counsel. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36405 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
on two grounds. First, he sought to withdraw his guilty pleas on the basis that trial counsel rendered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52890 - 2014-09-15
on two grounds. First, he sought to withdraw his guilty pleas on the basis that trial counsel rendered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52890 - 2014-09-15