Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36531 - 36540 of 65279 for timed.

[PDF] NOTICE
not consider arguments raised for the first time on appeal. State v. Hansford, 219 Wis. 2d 226, 243 n.16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27485 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
earlier, around 1987. The timing of Spuhler’s obstruction was relevant to the fourth special verdict
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101244 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Heriberto Castillo, Jr.
of time and effort in presenting this case; therefore, we will not dismiss the petition without
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17027 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
general knowledge and experience in conducting traffic stops which, at the time he stopped Garcia, did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=846810 - 2024-09-06

[PDF] CA Blank Order
general knowledge and experience in conducting traffic stops which, at the time he stopped Garcia, did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=846810 - 2024-09-06

State v. Richard Stensvad
or others if he was unmedicated for a period of time. These concerns find support in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7699 - 2005-03-31

La Crosse County v. Thomas J. Breidel
time, Breidel’s family appeared and Breidel stopped his efforts to try to close the door and stepped
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5195 - 2005-03-31

State v. Mark G. Bargenquast
to the officer at the time of the PBT was insufficient to establish probable cause for that test. He further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14543 - 2005-03-31

David T. Lass v. Heritage Mutual Insurance Company
that “[w]itnesses not timely named shall not be called as witnesses at trial, except for good cause shown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13627 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 6, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of...
, and a police report in which the victim had estimated the Buick’s value at the time of the theft as $3,000. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28317 - 2007-03-05