Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36541 - 36550 of 62048 for child support.
Search results 36541 - 36550 of 62048 for child support.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
nothing more in support of this claim, and we agree with the State that his contentions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92461 - 2014-09-15
nothing more in support of this claim, and we agree with the State that his contentions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92461 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of the facts that would support a conclusion that the officer lacked reasonable suspicion at the time he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78153 - 2012-02-15
of the facts that would support a conclusion that the officer lacked reasonable suspicion at the time he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78153 - 2012-02-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
The following relevant evidence was presented at the November 3 trial. Introducing a supportive exhibit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196460 - 2017-09-21
The following relevant evidence was presented at the November 3 trial. Introducing a supportive exhibit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196460 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
stop was not supported by reasonable suspicion. We disagree and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 The State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194088 - 2017-09-21
stop was not supported by reasonable suspicion. We disagree and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 The State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194088 - 2017-09-21
State v. William Remington
Remington first cites the following passage from a footnote in Swanson to support his position: Unexplained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15715 - 2005-03-31
Remington first cites the following passage from a footnote in Swanson to support his position: Unexplained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15715 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
” hitting an officer. In support of his version of events, Manley attached video stills
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798450 - 2024-05-08
” hitting an officer. In support of his version of events, Manley attached video stills
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798450 - 2024-05-08
[PDF]
State v. Mark Anthony Kelley
penalty of nineteen years and Kelley’s motion failed to provide sufficient facts to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12542 - 2017-09-21
penalty of nineteen years and Kelley’s motion failed to provide sufficient facts to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12542 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. John Yang
support a finding of discriminatory racial selection, but proof of animosity is not required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4649 - 2017-09-19
support a finding of discriminatory racial selection, but proof of animosity is not required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4649 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
to support her negligence claim. No. 2007AP4 3 ¶5 In response, Walczak argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30387 - 2014-09-15
to support her negligence claim. No. 2007AP4 3 ¶5 In response, Walczak argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30387 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and their relationship to the primary sentencing factors is not supported by a review of the record. Rather
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147680 - 2017-09-21
and their relationship to the primary sentencing factors is not supported by a review of the record. Rather
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147680 - 2017-09-21