Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36551 - 36560 of 37734 for d's.
Search results 36551 - 36560 of 37734 for d's.
[PDF]
NOTICE
¶52 The order states that the court was “oblige[d]” to deny the petition without a hearing because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61789 - 2014-09-15
¶52 The order states that the court was “oblige[d]” to deny the petition without a hearing because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61789 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Jennifer K. Matejka
Patience D. Roggensack, reversed. State v. Matejka, No. 99- 0070-CR, unpublished slip op. (Sept. 2, 1999
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17470 - 2017-09-21
Patience D. Roggensack, reversed. State v. Matejka, No. 99- 0070-CR, unpublished slip op. (Sept. 2, 1999
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17470 - 2017-09-21
State v. Nathaniel Crampton
affirmed. Publication in the official reports is not recommended. No. 97-3622-CR(D
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13383 - 2005-03-31
affirmed. Publication in the official reports is not recommended. No. 97-3622-CR(D
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13383 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was subsequently transferred to the Hon. Michael D. Zell, but no ruling of Judge Zell is at issue in this appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=683663 - 2023-07-27
was subsequently transferred to the Hon. Michael D. Zell, but no ruling of Judge Zell is at issue in this appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=683663 - 2023-07-27
[PDF]
WI App 43
of the case “with appropriate references to the record.” See also RULE 809.19(1)(d). The County’s brief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244461 - 2019-09-17
of the case “with appropriate references to the record.” See also RULE 809.19(1)(d). The County’s brief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244461 - 2019-09-17
[PDF]
State v. Elgine L. Storlie
of an intoxicant or did not have an alcohol concentration described under sub. (1)(b), (bm), (d) or (e
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2853 - 2017-09-19
of an intoxicant or did not have an alcohol concentration described under sub. (1)(b), (bm), (d) or (e
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2853 - 2017-09-19
City of Madison v. State of Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development
that Wagner violated department rules were those established by the legislature. See Wis. Stat. § 62.13(5)(d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4190 - 2005-03-31
that Wagner violated department rules were those established by the legislature. See Wis. Stat. § 62.13(5)(d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4190 - 2005-03-31
WI App 149 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP002135 Complete Tit...
school counselor, who testified that M.J.K. had a “D” average in high school, despite testing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71246 - 2011-11-28
school counselor, who testified that M.J.K. had a “D” average in high school, despite testing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71246 - 2011-11-28
State v. Anthony J. Leitner
. §§ 19.62(6), 46.283(7), 46.284(7), 46.2895(9), 301.35(1)(b), 940.32(1)(cr), and 947.013(1)(d). [22
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16400 - 2005-03-31
. §§ 19.62(6), 46.283(7), 46.284(7), 46.2895(9), 301.35(1)(b), 940.32(1)(cr), and 947.013(1)(d). [22
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16400 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
: william d. dyke, Judge. Affirmed. Before Blanchard, P.J., Lundsten and Sherman, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118853 - 2014-08-06
: william d. dyke, Judge. Affirmed. Before Blanchard, P.J., Lundsten and Sherman, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118853 - 2014-08-06