Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36551 - 36560 of 58828 for do.
Search results 36551 - 36560 of 58828 for do.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
recommendation by requiring that Hough register as a sex offender. Before doing so, however, the court made
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133790 - 2017-09-21
recommendation by requiring that Hough register as a sex offender. Before doing so, however, the court made
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133790 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jason Frederick Work
to do the crimes. Work was also charged with more crimes in another county. The difference in Work’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14554 - 2005-03-31
to do the crimes. Work was also charged with more crimes in another county. The difference in Work’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14554 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
kind of want to give him an incentive to do so ….” The court stated: [I]n some regards, the $15,080
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75595 - 2011-12-27
kind of want to give him an incentive to do so ….” The court stated: [I]n some regards, the $15,080
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75595 - 2011-12-27
State v. Larry E. Kraemer
, for that matter, did Kraemer do so at the hearing or on appeal. Where the elements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13356 - 2005-03-31
, for that matter, did Kraemer do so at the hearing or on appeal. Where the elements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13356 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
of law de novo. We conclude that the facts of this case do not support a conclusion that Attorney
/sc/dispord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35598 - 2009-02-15
of law de novo. We conclude that the facts of this case do not support a conclusion that Attorney
/sc/dispord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35598 - 2009-02-15
State v. Anthony Lee Tucker
entries and judgment of conviction[] do not demonstrate that the sentence is consecutive to any other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6602 - 2005-03-31
entries and judgment of conviction[] do not demonstrate that the sentence is consecutive to any other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6602 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Supreme Court Statistics October 2024
to hear a case before the Court of Appeals has had the opportunity to do so. This type of request
/sc/stats/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=875728 - 2024-12-09
to hear a case before the Court of Appeals has had the opportunity to do so. This type of request
/sc/stats/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=875728 - 2024-12-09
[PDF]
State v. Julie Dixon
considered the Davis or Jackson cases, despite this court’s direction to do so. On remand, we direct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13355 - 2017-09-21
considered the Davis or Jackson cases, despite this court’s direction to do so. On remand, we direct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13355 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Patrick C. Webster
as a repeater, and may do so only after finding that the defendant is in fact a repeater. Id. at 619-20
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13366 - 2017-09-21
as a repeater, and may do so only after finding that the defendant is in fact a repeater. Id. at 619-20
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13366 - 2017-09-21
State v. Arrmond B.
for the purpose of punishment, it was for the purpose of assisting this juvenile to do ... what would be in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9999 - 2005-03-31
for the purpose of punishment, it was for the purpose of assisting this juvenile to do ... what would be in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9999 - 2005-03-31