Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36551 - 36560 of 84039 for simple case search.
Search results 36551 - 36560 of 84039 for simple case search.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=454294 - 2021-11-23
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=454294 - 2021-11-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings. ¶2 This case arises from the sale
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243443 - 2019-07-17
, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings. ¶2 This case arises from the sale
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243443 - 2019-07-17
[PDF]
Sandra Kube v. Thomas A. Pietruszka
. This case arises from a dispute over Sandra L. Kube’s Hodunk Road property. Kube and Pietruszka entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14917 - 2017-09-21
. This case arises from a dispute over Sandra L. Kube’s Hodunk Road property. Kube and Pietruszka entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14917 - 2017-09-21
State v. Kenneth R. Zielinski
to support the State's case. Consequently, the credibility of Zielinski and the alleged victim, L.Z., were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8615 - 2005-03-31
to support the State's case. Consequently, the credibility of Zielinski and the alleged victim, L.Z., were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8615 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
required that he pay $7500. He asserts that under the facts and circumstances of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33508 - 2014-09-15
required that he pay $7500. He asserts that under the facts and circumstances of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33508 - 2014-09-15
Certification
. Rule 809.61 (2005-06)[1] this court certifies the appeal in this case to the Wisconsin Supreme Court
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29567 - 2007-07-02
. Rule 809.61 (2005-06)[1] this court certifies the appeal in this case to the Wisconsin Supreme Court
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29567 - 2007-07-02
[PDF]
NOTICE
Brown’s case; trial counsel was not obliged to predict that change in the law. See State v. McMahon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50284 - 2014-09-15
Brown’s case; trial counsel was not obliged to predict that change in the law. See State v. McMahon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50284 - 2014-09-15
Patricia L. Grochowski v. Robert Larson
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8902 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8902 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
was motivated by Jackson’s failure to appear as a victim witness in a different case. The circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35365 - 2014-09-15
was motivated by Jackson’s failure to appear as a victim witness in a different case. The circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35365 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of conviction erroneously indicates that two counts charged in this case were dismissed as read-ins
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183691 - 2017-09-21
of conviction erroneously indicates that two counts charged in this case were dismissed as read-ins
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183691 - 2017-09-21