Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36551 - 36560 of 84464 for simple case search.
Search results 36551 - 36560 of 84464 for simple case search.
[PDF]
CONFIDENTIAL COURT RECORD
, COUNTY [write the county where your case is heard] Petitioner (person who completed petition
/formdisplay/CV-420.pdf?formNumber=CV-420&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2026-06-02
, COUNTY [write the county where your case is heard] Petitioner (person who completed petition
/formdisplay/CV-420.pdf?formNumber=CV-420&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2026-06-02
COURT OF APPEALS
of these offenses in Milwaukee County. He points to various cases over the last thirty years in which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66704 - 2011-06-27
of these offenses in Milwaukee County. He points to various cases over the last thirty years in which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66704 - 2011-06-27
COURT OF APPEALS
from which he appeals are straightforward. In Shawano County case Nos. 2012FO303, 304, 305, 306, 307
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113091 - 2014-05-27
from which he appeals are straightforward. In Shawano County case Nos. 2012FO303, 304, 305, 306, 307
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113091 - 2014-05-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207642 - 2018-01-24
conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207642 - 2018-01-24
[PDF]
John McClellan v. Mary L. Santich
for Judge Sheedy’s involvement in this case. It contains no document showing that Judge Sheedy may have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12370 - 2017-09-21
for Judge Sheedy’s involvement in this case. It contains no document showing that Judge Sheedy may have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12370 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Dennis L. Farr
and in this case. To the extent he is alleging bias in this case, he has not cited any proof of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11495 - 2017-09-19
and in this case. To the extent he is alleging bias in this case, he has not cited any proof of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11495 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Allen Pautsch v. Phillip Kingston
for certiorari review was not timely filed in the circuit court. We decline to decide the case on this ground
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5524 - 2017-09-19
for certiorari review was not timely filed in the circuit court. We decline to decide the case on this ground
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5524 - 2017-09-19
State v. Lorenzo S. Balli
, 324 N.W.2d 292 (Ct. App. 1982). Balli urges us to review the case on the merits, explaining that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3181 - 2005-03-31
, 324 N.W.2d 292 (Ct. App. 1982). Balli urges us to review the case on the merits, explaining that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3181 - 2005-03-31
Allen Pautsch v. Phillip Kingston
court. We decline to decide the case on this ground because the “mail-box” rule may potentially apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5524 - 2005-03-31
court. We decline to decide the case on this ground because the “mail-box” rule may potentially apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5524 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to file a response. Fowler has not responded. I conclude that these cases are appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107724 - 2017-09-21
to file a response. Fowler has not responded. I conclude that these cases are appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107724 - 2017-09-21