Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36561 - 36570 of 57293 for id.
Search results 36561 - 36570 of 57293 for id.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to his or her release account. Id., ¶18. ¶8 Here, the final decision exhausting Kuranda’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133777 - 2017-09-21
to his or her release account. Id., ¶18. ¶8 Here, the final decision exhausting Kuranda’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133777 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Appeal No. 2007AP2742 Cir. Ct. No. 1997CF152
in the position of having to grant a petition for supervised release.” See id., ¶11. Rather, it argues
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34826 - 2014-09-15
in the position of having to grant a petition for supervised release.” See id., ¶11. Rather, it argues
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34826 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Cori E. Jeffers
in an “official capacity” means performing duties the officer was employed to perform. Id. Acting with “lawful
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12182 - 2017-09-21
in an “official capacity” means performing duties the officer was employed to perform. Id. Acting with “lawful
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12182 - 2017-09-21
WI APP 78 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP001659 Complete Title ...
. There are two types of stacking: inter-policy stacking and intra-policy stacking. Id., ¶14. “Inter-policy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113883 - 2014-07-29
. There are two types of stacking: inter-policy stacking and intra-policy stacking. Id., ¶14. “Inter-policy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113883 - 2014-07-29
Kennneth W. Dicks v. Employe Trust Funds Board
of an ambiguous statute. Id. However, an agency's entitlement to judicial deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9214 - 2005-03-31
of an ambiguous statute. Id. However, an agency's entitlement to judicial deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9214 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
City of Oshkosh v. Robert M. Sheets
is appropriate. Id. at 21-22. “The question of what constitutes reasonable suspicion is a common sense test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3001 - 2017-09-19
is appropriate. Id. at 21-22. “The question of what constitutes reasonable suspicion is a common sense test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3001 - 2017-09-19
State v. Martin Anthony Azevedo
will be admissible to show probable cause for an arrest, if the arrest is challenged.” Id. Chief Justice Abrahamson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4695 - 2005-03-31
will be admissible to show probable cause for an arrest, if the arrest is challenged.” Id. Chief Justice Abrahamson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4695 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
are clearly erroneous; then, we independently apply constitutional standards to those facts. Id. Discussion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46660 - 2010-02-03
are clearly erroneous; then, we independently apply constitutional standards to those facts. Id. Discussion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46660 - 2010-02-03
2009 WI APP 177
the motion to modify sentence. Id. If the defendant has demonstrated the existence of a new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43013 - 2009-12-15
the motion to modify sentence. Id. If the defendant has demonstrated the existence of a new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43013 - 2009-12-15
COURT OF APPEALS
question of law and fact. Id., ¶32. The trial court’s findings of fact regarding what happened
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30973 - 2007-11-27
question of law and fact. Id., ¶32. The trial court’s findings of fact regarding what happened
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30973 - 2007-11-27