Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36561 - 36570 of 63985 for records/1000.
Search results 36561 - 36570 of 63985 for records/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
than $3000, including five twenty-dollar bills whose serial numbers were pre- recorded. Police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118202 - 2014-09-15
than $3000, including five twenty-dollar bills whose serial numbers were pre- recorded. Police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118202 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
exercise of discretion is not apparent from the record, we remand and direct the circuit court to address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29987 - 2014-09-15
exercise of discretion is not apparent from the record, we remand and direct the circuit court to address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29987 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
mandatory duty to order restitution or to give its reasons on the record for not doing so.” Borst, 181
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30637 - 2014-09-15
mandatory duty to order restitution or to give its reasons on the record for not doing so.” Borst, 181
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30637 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Javee Ralston
to Intoxilyzer training and that he does not know where training records are located at the Town of Madison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10344 - 2017-09-20
to Intoxilyzer training and that he does not know where training records are located at the Town of Madison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10344 - 2017-09-20
CA Blank Order
responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, counsel’s report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103477 - 2013-10-22
responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, counsel’s report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103477 - 2013-10-22
COURT OF APPEALS
that it was contradicted by the record and “completely frivolous.” ¶4 Prude filed his third motion for plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32655 - 2008-05-12
that it was contradicted by the record and “completely frivolous.” ¶4 Prude filed his third motion for plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32655 - 2008-05-12
Andrew J. Peterson v. Andrew S. Peterson
of their filings, Andrew and MariLynn simply allege that summary judgment was inappropriate because “[t]he record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6253 - 2005-03-31
of their filings, Andrew and MariLynn simply allege that summary judgment was inappropriate because “[t]he record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6253 - 2005-03-31
State v. Amy McGee
that the subject search warrant was included in the appellate record. See Fiumefreddo v. McLean, 174 Wis.2d 10, 26
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9852 - 2005-03-31
that the subject search warrant was included in the appellate record. See Fiumefreddo v. McLean, 174 Wis.2d 10, 26
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9852 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case because: (1) it was not proven by the State when challenged by him; (2) the record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54236 - 2010-09-08
in this case because: (1) it was not proven by the State when challenged by him; (2) the record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54236 - 2010-09-08
COURT OF APPEALS
guns to him. The parties agree that there is no evidence in the record before us that the guns were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64139 - 2011-05-16
guns to him. The parties agree that there is no evidence in the record before us that the guns were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64139 - 2011-05-16