Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36581 - 36590 of 83001 for case codes/1000.

Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Theodore F. Mazza
2002 WI 36 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 76-0476-D & 83-0843-D Complete
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16843 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Darnell C. Stevens
in the no-merit procedure, or new claims that were never raised. Case law prohibits him from doing so, without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24740 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Michael Adam Watts
on the lesser included offense of reckless homicide. Watts cites established case law for the proposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2182 - 2017-09-19

2010 WI APP 131
2010 WI App 131 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2009AP2784 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53084 - 2011-08-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
., ¶¶13-14 (concluding that a case was moot when the order appealed from was expired
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=844361 - 2024-09-04

[PDF] State v. Brad E. Glaunert
. ¶12 The matter proceeded to a two-day jury trial in June 2002. At the close of the State’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5873 - 2017-09-19

Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Theodore F. Mazza
2002 WI 36 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 76-0476-D & 83-0843-D Complete
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16840 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
. However, the earlier version of § 973.01 addressed in both cases applied only to felonies.[3] Both cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42994 - 2009-11-02

[PDF] Rebecca J. Atwood v. Robert E. Atwood
, used for pre-retirement personal objectives. Robert argues that the court erred because cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12927 - 2017-09-21

Rupert J. Loeffler v. Emma G. Loeffler
. The general rule is that although counsel has justifiable cause for withdrawing from the case, he or she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9281 - 2005-03-31