Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36581 - 36590 of 62028 for child support.
Search results 36581 - 36590 of 62028 for child support.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 30, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of Appe...
was supported by reasonable suspicion, in light of the totality of the circumstances. See, e.g., State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33523 - 2008-07-29
was supported by reasonable suspicion, in light of the totality of the circumstances. See, e.g., State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33523 - 2008-07-29
Slough Creek Properties v. Columbia County
supported by columns or walls. Each portion of a building separated by division walls from the ground up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8839 - 2005-03-31
supported by columns or walls. Each portion of a building separated by division walls from the ground up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8839 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in the gas station parking lot. ¶4 In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79931 - 2014-09-15
in the gas station parking lot. ¶4 In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79931 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, we may not substitute our judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=446897 - 2021-11-02
to the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, we may not substitute our judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=446897 - 2021-11-02
[PDF]
State v. Ronald J. Saxon
ineffective for not having acknowledged the disability. The record does not support Saxon's claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8568 - 2017-09-19
ineffective for not having acknowledged the disability. The record does not support Saxon's claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8568 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of them provided direct support No. 2019AP2430-FT 5 of his claim that he had been an owner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=277404 - 2020-08-12
of them provided direct support No. 2019AP2430-FT 5 of his claim that he had been an owner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=277404 - 2020-08-12
[PDF]
NOTICE
that the evidence was insufficient to support the jury’s verdict. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 The State filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45467 - 2014-09-15
that the evidence was insufficient to support the jury’s verdict. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 The State filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45467 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Donald A. Lesavage
other crimes. The officer’s observations supporting an arrest need not be sufficient to prove guilt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15409 - 2017-09-21
other crimes. The officer’s observations supporting an arrest need not be sufficient to prove guilt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15409 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
Furthermore, the facts do not support the court’s conclusion that Engedal would have been unable to find other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90211 - 2012-12-10
Furthermore, the facts do not support the court’s conclusion that Engedal would have been unable to find other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90211 - 2012-12-10
[PDF]
State v. Richard J. Anthuber
. We begin with a synopsis of the necessity defense. The basic theory supporting it is that a person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9068 - 2017-09-19
. We begin with a synopsis of the necessity defense. The basic theory supporting it is that a person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9068 - 2017-09-19