Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36581 - 36590 of 63951 for records/1000.
Search results 36581 - 36590 of 63951 for records/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case because: (1) it was not proven by the State when challenged by him; (2) the record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54236 - 2010-09-08
in this case because: (1) it was not proven by the State when challenged by him; (2) the record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54236 - 2010-09-08
[PDF]
Charlene S. Mathewson v. Paul H. Mathewson
briefs. Upon review of those memoranda and the record, we affirm the trial court's order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8410 - 2017-09-19
briefs. Upon review of those memoranda and the record, we affirm the trial court's order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8410 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for reconsideration. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=265071 - 2020-06-23
for reconsideration. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=265071 - 2020-06-23
[PDF]
State v. Dale A. Coppock
credible, the Larson version was inherently unreasonable is unsupported by the record and is clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4980 - 2017-09-19
credible, the Larson version was inherently unreasonable is unsupported by the record and is clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4980 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Daniel H. Frasch
on the record." The reference to "any victim" includes those who were the target of a crime to which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10271 - 2017-09-20
on the record." The reference to "any victim" includes those who were the target of a crime to which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10271 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
were void because they (1) violated Wisconsin’s open meetings and public records laws, (2) violated UW
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31966 - 2008-02-27
were void because they (1) violated Wisconsin’s open meetings and public records laws, (2) violated UW
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31966 - 2008-02-27
State v. Robert J. DeFliger
this issue at the postconviction hearing, and thus he failed to make a record of trial counsel’s testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2934 - 2005-03-31
this issue at the postconviction hearing, and thus he failed to make a record of trial counsel’s testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2934 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 23, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
not show a “clear and justifiable excuse.” Therefore, the record shows the trial court exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27853 - 2007-01-22
not show a “clear and justifiable excuse.” Therefore, the record shows the trial court exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27853 - 2007-01-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
relevant to Huggett’s claims of self defense. This court held that the police should have recorded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68987 - 2014-09-15
relevant to Huggett’s claims of self defense. This court held that the police should have recorded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68987 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
his vehicle. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=762492 - 2024-02-14
his vehicle. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=762492 - 2024-02-14