Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36581 - 36590 of 63981 for records/1000.
Search results 36581 - 36590 of 63981 for records/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
that it was contradicted by the record and “completely frivolous.” ¶4 Prude filed his third motion for plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32655 - 2008-05-12
that it was contradicted by the record and “completely frivolous.” ¶4 Prude filed his third motion for plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32655 - 2008-05-12
Andrew J. Peterson v. Andrew S. Peterson
of their filings, Andrew and MariLynn simply allege that summary judgment was inappropriate because “[t]he record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6253 - 2005-03-31
of their filings, Andrew and MariLynn simply allege that summary judgment was inappropriate because “[t]he record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6253 - 2005-03-31
State v. Amy McGee
that the subject search warrant was included in the appellate record. See Fiumefreddo v. McLean, 174 Wis.2d 10, 26
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9852 - 2005-03-31
that the subject search warrant was included in the appellate record. See Fiumefreddo v. McLean, 174 Wis.2d 10, 26
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9852 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
court must “search the record to support the conclusion reached by the fact finder.” [This] rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91562 - 2013-01-14
court must “search the record to support the conclusion reached by the fact finder.” [This] rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91562 - 2013-01-14
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case because: (1) it was not proven by the State when challenged by him; (2) the record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54236 - 2010-09-08
in this case because: (1) it was not proven by the State when challenged by him; (2) the record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54236 - 2010-09-08
COURT OF APPEALS
guns to him. The parties agree that there is no evidence in the record before us that the guns were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64139 - 2011-05-16
guns to him. The parties agree that there is no evidence in the record before us that the guns were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64139 - 2011-05-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
will not reverse a discretionary determination if the record shows that discretion was in fact exercised and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242202 - 2019-06-19
will not reverse a discretionary determination if the record shows that discretion was in fact exercised and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242202 - 2019-06-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=792641 - 2024-04-23
. Based upon our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=792641 - 2024-04-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of improper factors. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699505 - 2023-09-06
of improper factors. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699505 - 2023-09-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of improper factors. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699505 - 2023-09-06
of improper factors. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699505 - 2023-09-06