Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36591 - 36600 of 40043 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 36591 - 36600 of 40043 for financial disclosure statement.
State v. Randolph P. Haushalter
penalties and embarrassment of conviction.” Id. at 49, 313 N.W.2d at 75 (emphasis added). This statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15125 - 2005-03-31
penalties and embarrassment of conviction.” Id. at 49, 313 N.W.2d at 75 (emphasis added). This statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15125 - 2005-03-31
State v. Shannan M. Nipple
, elected to present her case entirely through cross-examination and in opening and closing statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13829 - 2005-03-31
, elected to present her case entirely through cross-examination and in opening and closing statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13829 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
four issues in his statement of the issues, which we paraphrase as follows: (1) whether Jones
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98791 - 2013-07-01
four issues in his statement of the issues, which we paraphrase as follows: (1) whether Jones
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98791 - 2013-07-01
Joseph E. Bejcek v. Ann M. Bejcek
, numerous fact statements are unaccompanied by any record citation or accompanied only by general citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18250 - 2005-05-23
, numerous fact statements are unaccompanied by any record citation or accompanied only by general citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18250 - 2005-05-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
this statement. On the trial date of November 29, 2022, the deferred prosecution offer was not placed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1069279 - 2026-01-28
this statement. On the trial date of November 29, 2022, the deferred prosecution offer was not placed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1069279 - 2026-01-28
[PDF]
State v. Michael S. Behnken
five years, he never affirmatively responded to these specific statements by the court. Thus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3287 - 2017-09-19
five years, he never affirmatively responded to these specific statements by the court. Thus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3287 - 2017-09-19
State v. Mark E. Smith
that the juror’s statements showed bias was manifest, which showing required the juror to be excused, and because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13255 - 2005-03-31
that the juror’s statements showed bias was manifest, which showing required the juror to be excused, and because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13255 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joseph R. Przybilla
that the chief threw Przybilla up against a car. The difference between the statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9172 - 2005-03-31
that the chief threw Przybilla up against a car. The difference between the statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9172 - 2005-03-31
Brown County Department of Human Services v. Kim A. S.
of intoxication, and by its statements to Kim at the dispositional hearing. He further contends that the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12674 - 2005-03-31
of intoxication, and by its statements to Kim at the dispositional hearing. He further contends that the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12674 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
such statement. Nowhere does the footnote suggest that only evidence presented by the client may be considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36692 - 2009-06-03
such statement. Nowhere does the footnote suggest that only evidence presented by the client may be considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36692 - 2009-06-03