Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3661 - 3670 of 68485 for did.
Search results 3661 - 3670 of 68485 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
did not take the child to a Skype visitation session that was scheduled for January 11, 2014. Second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116325 - 2014-07-08
did not take the child to a Skype visitation session that was scheduled for January 11, 2014. Second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116325 - 2014-07-08
Valiant Tiske v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
appearances in the case and did not participate in the settlement negotiations. After the Tiskes settled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12894 - 2005-03-31
appearances in the case and did not participate in the settlement negotiations. After the Tiskes settled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12894 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Dennis Stensaas v. Jeffrey Becker
that the Stensaases did not have an unjust enrichment claim against Becker. We agree and affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8290 - 2017-09-19
that the Stensaases did not have an unjust enrichment claim against Becker. We agree and affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8290 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
arresting officer did not have probable cause to have him submit to a preliminary breath test (PBT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111776 - 2017-09-21
arresting officer did not have probable cause to have him submit to a preliminary breath test (PBT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111776 - 2017-09-21
State v. John D. Mascaretti
convictions. Defense counsel did not disagree as to the number but raised with the court the fact that some
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15614 - 2005-03-31
convictions. Defense counsel did not disagree as to the number but raised with the court the fact that some
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15614 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
modification, Eduardo Aranda challenges his sentence. We affirm because the circuit court did not misuse its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78867 - 2012-03-06
modification, Eduardo Aranda challenges his sentence. We affirm because the circuit court did not misuse its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78867 - 2012-03-06
COURT OF APPEALS
, hired postconviction, that Cooley did not have a gun during the robbery. The circuit court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80189 - 2012-04-02
, hired postconviction, that Cooley did not have a gun during the robbery. The circuit court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80189 - 2012-04-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to argue the circuit court did not inform Profit of all the elements of the crime; (2) this court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95542 - 2014-09-15
to argue the circuit court did not inform Profit of all the elements of the crime; (2) this court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95542 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
that he did not understand the plea and it had been coerced. The circuit court held a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30065 - 2014-09-15
that he did not understand the plea and it had been coerced. The circuit court held a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30065 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
his sentence. We affirm because the circuit court did not misuse its sentencing discretion. ΒΆ2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78867 - 2014-09-15
his sentence. We affirm because the circuit court did not misuse its sentencing discretion. ΒΆ2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78867 - 2014-09-15