Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3661 - 3670 of 21731 for warrants.
Search results 3661 - 3670 of 21731 for warrants.
State v. Randy J. Stahl
factor warranting resentencing, we reverse the order and remand for further proceedings. BACKGROUND ΒΆ2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26339 - 2006-08-30
factor warranting resentencing, we reverse the order and remand for further proceedings. BACKGROUND ΒΆ2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26339 - 2006-08-30
State v. Esther T.
son and because the evidence here was not so egregious as to warrant termination of her parental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4354 - 2005-03-31
son and because the evidence here was not so egregious as to warrant termination of her parental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4354 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Leporld L. Miller
a bench warrant for his arrest. On May 11, 1994, Miller was returned to court on the bench warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8511 - 2017-09-19
a bench warrant for his arrest. On May 11, 1994, Miller was returned to court on the bench warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8511 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
renews her claim that sentence modification is warranted based on a new factor. A new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1077740 - 2026-02-17
renews her claim that sentence modification is warranted based on a new factor. A new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1077740 - 2026-02-17
[PDF]
State v. William Wilson Gordon
. See id. at 163-64, 549 N.W.2d at 441. Gordon argues that a new trial is warranted because evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12843 - 2017-09-21
. See id. at 163-64, 549 N.W.2d at 441. Gordon argues that a new trial is warranted because evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12843 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
violated without developing any coherent legal arguments to explain why relief is warranted. While we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111006 - 2014-04-23
violated without developing any coherent legal arguments to explain why relief is warranted. While we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111006 - 2014-04-23
State v. Ronald M. Vales
denied Vales's postconviction motion without a hearing. In order to warrant an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10065 - 2005-03-31
denied Vales's postconviction motion without a hearing. In order to warrant an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10065 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert L. Dumas
are presumptively unreasonable, and evidence seized without a warrant may be inadmissible at trial. Welsh v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13305 - 2005-03-31
are presumptively unreasonable, and evidence seized without a warrant may be inadmissible at trial. Welsh v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13305 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
submitted a 2009 search warrant and supporting affidavit in which Lewis is identified as implicating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85981 - 2014-09-15
submitted a 2009 search warrant and supporting affidavit in which Lewis is identified as implicating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85981 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
which, taken together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant that intrusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42427 - 2014-09-15
which, taken together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant that intrusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42427 - 2014-09-15