Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36601 - 36610 of 62063 for child support.

COURT OF APPEALS
. The postconviction motion was denied. ¶4 To support a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66544 - 2011-06-28

[PDF] Jeanne Finkenbinder v. State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Co.
to support the awarding of costs to the third- party defendants. However, a persuasive argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12047 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
” (citation omitted)). Moreover, Ford did not imply that a variance on its facts would support a finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33921 - 2008-09-10

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
are not bound by counsel’s conclusion that the facts would not have supported a suppression motion. Rather
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=647943 - 2023-04-27

[PDF] State v. Richard G. Giese
the supporting evidence presented by Giese, determined that Giese’s plea to the prior conviction was freely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14989 - 2017-09-21

James E. Johnson v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
(Ct. App. 1985). Moreover, Johnson offers no support for his contention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9573 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Joseph White
member and supported the victim's initiation into the gang. The evidence further showed that part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8314 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
or authorized by law, 55 miles per hour.” ¶7 In support of his argument, Adams offered the meeting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132761 - 2015-01-12

State v. Scott Elvers
nonetheless applies. We see cogent arguments on both sides of the issue. In support of a broad “across
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18765 - 2005-06-28

Westel - Milwaukee Company, Inc. v. Walworth County
to support a decision to deny the permit. Cellular One now renews its request for judicial relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9453 - 2005-03-31