Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36611 - 36620 of 63677 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 36611 - 36620 of 63677 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
State v. James Randall
. McMahon presided over the postconviction motion and issued the order denying relief. No. 94-1053
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7846 - 2017-09-19
. McMahon presided over the postconviction motion and issued the order denying relief. No. 94-1053
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7846 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Ritchie H. Dumer
a § 974.06, STATS., postconviction motion to withdraw his no contest pleas. Dumer argues that he was denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7721 - 2017-09-19
a § 974.06, STATS., postconviction motion to withdraw his no contest pleas. Dumer argues that he was denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7721 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Kevin C. Spinks
postconviction motion, alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. Spinks claims: (1) his appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18386 - 2017-09-21
postconviction motion, alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. Spinks claims: (1) his appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18386 - 2017-09-21
State v. Christopher L. Logan
that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress evidence discovered in his mother’s house
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6854 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress evidence discovered in his mother’s house
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6854 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Johnny W. Williams
also appeals from orders denying his postconviction motion for sentence modification. Williams
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13208 - 2017-09-21
also appeals from orders denying his postconviction motion for sentence modification. Williams
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13208 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. James E. Miller
2 motions for a directed verdict and a judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Miller appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7485 - 2017-09-20
2 motions for a directed verdict and a judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Miller appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7485 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Evelyn Hommrich v. Joseph Van Beek
that the trial court erroneously (1) dismissed the action on its own motion; (2) determined the statements were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12253 - 2017-09-21
that the trial court erroneously (1) dismissed the action on its own motion; (2) determined the statements were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12253 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
-12).[1] Cornelius argues that the trial court should have granted his pretrial motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130148 - 2014-11-24
-12).[1] Cornelius argues that the trial court should have granted his pretrial motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130148 - 2014-11-24
COURT OF APPEALS
a firearm as a felon. The only issue is whether the trial court properly denied his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121738 - 2015-06-03
a firearm as a felon. The only issue is whether the trial court properly denied his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121738 - 2015-06-03
COURT OF APPEALS
concentration of .208 percent. ¶6 Pieschel filed a motion to suppress all evidence stemming from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32630 - 2008-05-06
concentration of .208 percent. ¶6 Pieschel filed a motion to suppress all evidence stemming from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32630 - 2008-05-06