Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36611 - 36620 of 66013 for motion to dismiss.
Search results 36611 - 36620 of 66013 for motion to dismiss.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the motion to withdraw the plea, Green had already obtained review by a DNA expert. Green sought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83627 - 2014-09-15
of the motion to withdraw the plea, Green had already obtained review by a DNA expert. Green sought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83627 - 2014-09-15
Michael Kielblock v. Hytec Manufacturing, Inc.
the circuit court denied a motion to extend the time for filing a proper answer, effectively striking Hytec’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6761 - 2005-03-31
the circuit court denied a motion to extend the time for filing a proper answer, effectively striking Hytec’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6761 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Cleveland Brown
an order denying his postconviction motion to withdraw his plea. Brown contends that his plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19345 - 2017-09-21
an order denying his postconviction motion to withdraw his plea. Brown contends that his plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19345 - 2017-09-21
Brown County Dept. of Human Services v. Laurie and Loonie M.
. They also appeal an order denying their motion for plea withdrawal. We affirm the orders. FACTS ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24734 - 2006-04-10
. They also appeal an order denying their motion for plea withdrawal. We affirm the orders. FACTS ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24734 - 2006-04-10
State v. Melvin Caballero
an order denying his post-conviction motion. Caballero claims: (1) that he was denied effective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9337 - 2005-03-31
an order denying his post-conviction motion. Caballero claims: (1) that he was denied effective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9337 - 2005-03-31
State v. Danny L. Peterson
his plea-withdrawal motion.[1] The issues are whether Peterson is entitled to an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20676 - 2005-12-19
his plea-withdrawal motion.[1] The issues are whether Peterson is entitled to an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20676 - 2005-12-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
offense, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 346.63(1)(a), and an order denying his motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94141 - 2014-09-15
offense, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 346.63(1)(a), and an order denying his motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94141 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Howard, pro se, appeals a circuit court order that denied Howard’s motion for a new trial based
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137519 - 2017-09-21
Howard, pro se, appeals a circuit court order that denied Howard’s motion for a new trial based
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137519 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 26, 2010 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
-08)[1]. Sahs argues that the trial court erred when it denied both his motion to suppress statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55869 - 2010-11-18
-08)[1]. Sahs argues that the trial court erred when it denied both his motion to suppress statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55869 - 2010-11-18
COURT OF APPEALS
to Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a), and an order denying his motion to suppress evidence. Vogt challenges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94141 - 2013-03-13
to Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a), and an order denying his motion to suppress evidence. Vogt challenges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94141 - 2013-03-13