Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36631 - 36640 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
Search results 36631 - 36640 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1028178 - 2025-10-29
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1028178 - 2025-10-29
State v. Brian J. Dorsey
have altered the outcome of the case. See State v. Leighton, 2000 WI App 156, ¶38, 237 Wis. 2d 709
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18503 - 2005-06-13
have altered the outcome of the case. See State v. Leighton, 2000 WI App 156, ¶38, 237 Wis. 2d 709
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18503 - 2005-06-13
[PDF]
NOTICE
on Obriecht’s future ability to file cases as a sanction for filing a frivolous appeal. We agree the present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31175 - 2014-09-15
on Obriecht’s future ability to file cases as a sanction for filing a frivolous appeal. We agree the present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31175 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Leroy W. Senn
motion to dismiss at the conclusion of the State’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3472 - 2017-09-20
motion to dismiss at the conclusion of the State’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3472 - 2017-09-20
State v. Henry A. Phillips
the circumstances in this case, Phillips' admission was sufficient. Therefore, this court affirms the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13887 - 2005-03-31
the circumstances in this case, Phillips' admission was sufficient. Therefore, this court affirms the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13887 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
noted that Max had four other delinquency petitions issued prior to the petition in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=583033 - 2022-11-01
noted that Max had four other delinquency petitions issued prior to the petition in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=583033 - 2022-11-01
[PDF]
State v. Steven J. Reinhardt
that his probation agent had documents in his possession which might be relevant to the case. Counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2978 - 2017-09-19
that his probation agent had documents in his possession which might be relevant to the case. Counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2978 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Rupert J. Loeffler v. Emma G. Loeffler
is that although counsel has justifiable cause for withdrawing from the case, he or she is not entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9281 - 2017-09-19
is that although counsel has justifiable cause for withdrawing from the case, he or she is not entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9281 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
need not reach this issue. See State v. Castillo, 213 Wis. 2d 488, 492, 570 N.W.2d 44 (1997) (cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56222 - 2014-09-15
need not reach this issue. See State v. Castillo, 213 Wis. 2d 488, 492, 570 N.W.2d 44 (1997) (cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56222 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
-18).1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252302 - 2020-01-08
-18).1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252302 - 2020-01-08