Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36641 - 36650 of 82993 for case codes/1000.
Search results 36641 - 36650 of 82993 for case codes/1000.
State v. Robert Vargas
in the past he admitted it and took his punishment but that he did not make such an admission in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8463 - 2005-03-31
in the past he admitted it and took his punishment but that he did not make such an admission in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8463 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
at 702. ¶4 When the case was returned, the circuit court asked the parties to brief arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49969 - 2010-05-17
at 702. ¶4 When the case was returned, the circuit court asked the parties to brief arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49969 - 2010-05-17
COURT OF APPEALS
. 1989) (“cases should be decided on the narrowest possible ground”). I. ¶2 Olu A. Rhodes and his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51725 - 2010-07-06
. 1989) (“cases should be decided on the narrowest possible ground”). I. ¶2 Olu A. Rhodes and his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51725 - 2010-07-06
[PDF]
NOTICE
, JJ. No. 2009AP2412 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. This is a worker’s compensation case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55769 - 2014-09-15
, JJ. No. 2009AP2412 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. This is a worker’s compensation case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55769 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
cases that were handled together pursuant to a joint plea agreement. We affirm for the reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30817 - 2014-09-15
cases that were handled together pursuant to a joint plea agreement. We affirm for the reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30817 - 2014-09-15
State v. Ernest J.P., Jr.
has misinterpreted the statute, which does not purport to dictate how the county must prove its case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7128 - 2005-03-31
has misinterpreted the statute, which does not purport to dictate how the county must prove its case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7128 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. In this case, Pieters testified, an ethanol test was conducted by analyst Dan McManaway. McManaway’s test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145573 - 2017-09-21
. In this case, Pieters testified, an ethanol test was conducted by analyst Dan McManaway. McManaway’s test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145573 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Larry J. Sprosty
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-3524 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13344 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-3524 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13344 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Joshua Jenkins
. ¶9 The threshold issue in this case is whether, under the facts and circumstances, Jenkins had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15367 - 2017-09-21
. ¶9 The threshold issue in this case is whether, under the facts and circumstances, Jenkins had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15367 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Lynn Morrissey
2005 WI 2 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 04-1869-D COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16836 - 2017-09-21
2005 WI 2 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 04-1869-D COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16836 - 2017-09-21