Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36651 - 36660 of 74376 for a ha.
Search results 36651 - 36660 of 74376 for a ha.
COURT OF APPEALS
] In order to grant a new trial in the interests of justice, we must be convinced that there has been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38630 - 2009-07-29
] In order to grant a new trial in the interests of justice, we must be convinced that there has been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38630 - 2009-07-29
[PDF]
Robert J. Hillis v. Village of Fox Point Board of Appeals
; they purchased it in 1995. No evidence suggests that the McGees’ house has ever been used other than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7584 - 2017-09-19
; they purchased it in 1995. No evidence suggests that the McGees’ house has ever been used other than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7584 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
testified that Danielle has a bond with her, called her “TT,”4 and knows her as her aunt. She further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=510208 - 2022-04-19
testified that Danielle has a bond with her, called her “TT,”4 and knows her as her aunt. She further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=510208 - 2022-04-19
[PDF]
State v. Robert J. Smothers
. Before Nettesheim, P.J., Brown and Anderson, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Robert J. Smothers has appealed from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3452 - 2017-09-19
. Before Nettesheim, P.J., Brown and Anderson, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Robert J. Smothers has appealed from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3452 - 2017-09-19
David L. Nichols v. Charles D. Wingrove
in the frivolous malpractice claim. Whether the court has statutory authority to issue the contempt order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3357 - 2005-03-31
in the frivolous malpractice claim. Whether the court has statutory authority to issue the contempt order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3357 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
asserted that “recently new evidence has been discovered that [Judge Wirtz] was prior, my personal lawyer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40947 - 2014-09-15
asserted that “recently new evidence has been discovered that [Judge Wirtz] was prior, my personal lawyer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40947 - 2014-09-15
James Munroe v. Patrick D. Braatz
for that purpose only. The examination has not been designed to be used as a selection criteri[on] by the public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9679 - 2005-03-31
for that purpose only. The examination has not been designed to be used as a selection criteri[on] by the public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9679 - 2005-03-31
State v. Sally Ann Minniecheske
testified he has known the Minniescheskes his whole life. He testified that Minniescheske pulled up in her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12127 - 2005-03-31
testified he has known the Minniescheskes his whole life. He testified that Minniescheske pulled up in her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12127 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
has appealed from a judgment convicting him of being a felon in possession of a firearm. Newman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78531 - 2014-09-15
has appealed from a judgment convicting him of being a felon in possession of a firearm. Newman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78531 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of this section if he or she has been: (a) Convicted of a felony in this state. (b) Convicted of a crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144391 - 2017-09-21
of this section if he or she has been: (a) Convicted of a felony in this state. (b) Convicted of a crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144391 - 2017-09-21