Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36651 - 36660 of 62027 for child support.
Search results 36651 - 36660 of 62027 for child support.
COURT OF APPEALS
of the facts that would support a conclusion that the officer lacked reasonable suspicion at the time he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78153 - 2012-02-15
of the facts that would support a conclusion that the officer lacked reasonable suspicion at the time he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78153 - 2012-02-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
The following relevant evidence was presented at the November 3 trial. Introducing a supportive exhibit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196460 - 2017-09-21
The following relevant evidence was presented at the November 3 trial. Introducing a supportive exhibit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196460 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
stop was not supported by reasonable suspicion. We disagree and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 The State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194088 - 2017-09-21
stop was not supported by reasonable suspicion. We disagree and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 The State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194088 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 3, 2007 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of Ap...
there was substantial evidence to support the agency’s decision, i.e., “whether reasonable minds could arrive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27622 - 2007-01-02
there was substantial evidence to support the agency’s decision, i.e., “whether reasonable minds could arrive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27622 - 2007-01-02
State v. William Remington
Remington first cites the following passage from a footnote in Swanson to support his position: Unexplained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15715 - 2005-03-31
Remington first cites the following passage from a footnote in Swanson to support his position: Unexplained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15715 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
” hitting an officer. In support of his version of events, Manley attached video stills
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798450 - 2024-05-08
” hitting an officer. In support of his version of events, Manley attached video stills
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798450 - 2024-05-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The defendant’s first claim is conclusory and without the requisite factual support necessary to show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104257 - 2017-09-21
. The defendant’s first claim is conclusory and without the requisite factual support necessary to show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104257 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Stephen Boudwin v. Windjammers Sailing Club, Inc.
the late 1940s until the gate was erected in 1992. The record supports the finding that Channel Road had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15398 - 2017-09-21
the late 1940s until the gate was erected in 1992. The record supports the finding that Channel Road had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15398 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Mark Anthony Kelley
penalty of nineteen years and Kelley’s motion failed to provide sufficient facts to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12542 - 2017-09-21
penalty of nineteen years and Kelley’s motion failed to provide sufficient facts to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12542 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. John Yang
support a finding of discriminatory racial selection, but proof of animosity is not required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4649 - 2017-09-19
support a finding of discriminatory racial selection, but proof of animosity is not required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4649 - 2017-09-19