Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36651 - 36660 of 63933 for records/1000.

COURT OF APPEALS
, that he has personally examined Anne in the past and was able to review her medical records from the past
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75811 - 2011-12-27

[PDF] State v. Randy R. Mertz
, the findings or opinion of the trial court and limited portions of the record essential to an understanding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8617 - 2017-09-19

State v. Antonio V. Henderson
that the conditional release was never effectuated. ¶8 The record demonstrates that when the not guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14979 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Kiemonte Lamont King
reasonably, and the defendant bears the burden of showing unreasonableness from the record. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10729 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] NOTICE
of the direct consequences of his pleas. The record does not support Stone’s argument. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36216 - 2014-09-15

Tayr Kilaab al Ghashiyah(Khan) v. Daniel Bertrand
not appear in the record. On review by certiorari, this court is confined to the record. Berschens v. Town
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11890 - 2012-10-25

COURT OF APPEALS
that Donald engaged in shirking, and the current record would not support such a finding. ¶9 Moreover
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132238 - 2014-12-29

COURT OF APPEALS
court must “search the record to support the conclusion reached by the fact finder.” [This] rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91562 - 2013-01-14

State v. Ardenia M. Lawson
into a felony. ¶13 The record here does not establish that Lawson’s actions were likely to interfere
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5720 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Secura Insurance Company v. Jerry Brubaker
judge could decide that it was based on the record and the facts as found by the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6087 - 2017-09-19