Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36661 - 36670 of 63654 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 36661 - 36670 of 63654 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS
motion for a new trial following his conviction for first-degree intentional homicide. Ott argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35012 - 2008-12-22
motion for a new trial following his conviction for first-degree intentional homicide. Ott argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35012 - 2008-12-22
2009 WI APP 99
(1m)(h)2. (2007-08).[1] Earl contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36881 - 2009-07-28
(1m)(h)2. (2007-08).[1] Earl contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36881 - 2009-07-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
surcharge “as a portion of his rehabilitation.” ¶5 Virgil filed a postconviction motion asserting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95671 - 2014-09-15
surcharge “as a portion of his rehabilitation.” ¶5 Virgil filed a postconviction motion asserting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95671 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Marjorie Leonard v. Judy R. Cattahach
when it refused to find excusable neglect, denied DuPont’s motion for an enlargement of time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11654 - 2017-09-19
when it refused to find excusable neglect, denied DuPont’s motion for an enlargement of time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11654 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a jury trial, and an order denying a postconviction motion. On appeal, Crawford contends that: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=540382 - 2022-07-06
a jury trial, and an order denying a postconviction motion. On appeal, Crawford contends that: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=540382 - 2022-07-06
Margaret T. Kane v. Timothy Berken
for summary judgment and to dismiss for failure to state a claim. In support of his motion, Berken filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14823 - 2005-03-31
for summary judgment and to dismiss for failure to state a claim. In support of his motion, Berken filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14823 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court order granting Plaintiff Wilson Land Holdings, LLC’s (WLH) motion for partial summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160442 - 2017-09-21
court order granting Plaintiff Wilson Land Holdings, LLC’s (WLH) motion for partial summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160442 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
City of Milwaukee v. Michael A. Bell
acquittal of the companion charge of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated; (2) denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16040 - 2017-09-21
acquittal of the companion charge of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated; (2) denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16040 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that this appeal is not frivolous and therefore deny Audrey’s motion for costs and fees under WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=446954 - 2021-10-28
that this appeal is not frivolous and therefore deny Audrey’s motion for costs and fees under WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=446954 - 2021-10-28
[PDF]
State v. Marc Norfleet
. §§ 961.16(2)(b)1 and 961.41(1m)(cm)4. ¶3 On August 18, 2000, defense counsel filed a Motion and Demand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3991 - 2017-09-20
. §§ 961.16(2)(b)1 and 961.41(1m)(cm)4. ¶3 On August 18, 2000, defense counsel filed a Motion and Demand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3991 - 2017-09-20