Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36661 - 36670 of 68466 for did.

State v. Kimy E. Trotter
of the residence to be searched. Trotter did not, however, raise these arguments with specificity until after she
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13203 - 2005-03-31

Allen J. Thomas v. Kenneth N. Johnson
searches for jail security and could review mail that did not immediately reveal its privileged status
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9534 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Robert Counter
to call witnesses. Robert did not ask to call witnesses. He offers no explanation why he did not inform
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10303 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Michael A. Pharo v. State of Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission
amendments that became effective in 1998 to conduct that occurred before that date. We conclude it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6446 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Jarrell L. Henry
to effect a traffic stop of the vehicle driven by Mr. Henry, he did not respond and drove away. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4297 - 2017-09-19

State v. Robert Curtis
was not prejudiced by it. It did not link him to the crimes, but merely established that the victim had recently had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8145 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
and being a felon in possession of a firearm in 1995. Wright was represented by Mark Lipscomb, Esq. He did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74176 - 2011-11-21

[PDF] Betty L. Conway v. Zoning Board of Adjustment for the Town of Harmony
. The dispositive issue is whether they timely commenced the action. We conclude that they did not, and therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10797 - 2017-09-20

State v. Thomas M. Schottler
not expressed or showed any difficulty understanding the theory of defense or the law related to it. Nelson did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5794 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
objective of rehabilitating Miller. That argument fails for two reasons. First, the court did not link
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86137 - 2012-08-20