Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36671 - 36680 of 91451 for 1.
Search results 36671 - 36680 of 91451 for 1.
Frontsheet
REVIEW of a decision of the Court of Appeals. Affirmed. ¶1 N. PATRICK CROOKS, J. This is a review
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116897 - 2014-07-10
REVIEW of a decision of the Court of Appeals. Affirmed. ¶1 N. PATRICK CROOKS, J. This is a review
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116897 - 2014-07-10
Angeline Boles v. Patrick Winnie
an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See § 808.10 and Rule 809.62(1), Stats. This opinion is subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10704 - 2005-03-31
an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See § 808.10 and Rule 809.62(1), Stats. This opinion is subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10704 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Maxie W. Harvey, Jr.
. VERGERONT, J.1 Maxie Harvey appeals the judgments of conviction for two counts of operating a motor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14462 - 2017-09-21
. VERGERONT, J.1 Maxie Harvey appeals the judgments of conviction for two counts of operating a motor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14462 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
is appropriate for No. 2023AP521 2 summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1) (2023-24
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1020843 - 2025-10-08
is appropriate for No. 2023AP521 2 summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1) (2023-24
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1020843 - 2025-10-08
[PDF]
Public Reprimand with Consent - Janet L. Heins
was available for him to pick up at her office.1 The check was drawn on Heins’ business account
/services/public/lawyerreg/statuspublic/heins.pdf - 2020-12-09
was available for him to pick up at her office.1 The check was drawn on Heins’ business account
/services/public/lawyerreg/statuspublic/heins.pdf - 2020-12-09
[PDF]
La Crosse County v. Thomas J. Breidel
and MICHAEL J. MULROY, Judges. Affirmed. ¶1 ROGGENSACK, J. 1 Thomas J. Breidel appeals the denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5195 - 2017-09-19
and MICHAEL J. MULROY, Judges. Affirmed. ¶1 ROGGENSACK, J. 1 Thomas J. Breidel appeals the denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5195 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1 We affirm the order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1025205 - 2025-10-22
is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1 We affirm the order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1025205 - 2025-10-22
[PDF]
State v. Maxine Anderson
. Before Brown, Anderson and Snyder, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Maxine Anderson appeals from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3650 - 2017-09-19
. Before Brown, Anderson and Snyder, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Maxine Anderson appeals from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3650 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Bobby C. Felicelli
in violation of §§ 961.41(1m)(h)1 and 961.49(1), STATS. The sole issue raised on appeal is whether the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14415 - 2014-09-15
in violation of §§ 961.41(1m)(h)1 and 961.49(1), STATS. The sole issue raised on appeal is whether the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14415 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Michael J. Baye
. See § 808.10 and RULE 809.62(1), STATS. This opinion is subject to further editing. If published
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8822 - 2017-09-19
. See § 808.10 and RULE 809.62(1), STATS. This opinion is subject to further editing. If published
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8822 - 2017-09-19