Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36671 - 36680 of 65775 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 36671 - 36680 of 65775 for divorce records/1000.
CA Blank Order
independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107784 - 2014-02-03
independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107784 - 2014-02-03
[PDF]
State v. James Warren
to the report. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11717 - 2017-09-20
to the report. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11717 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
an independent review of the records as mandated by Anders, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=462389 - 2021-12-14
an independent review of the records as mandated by Anders, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=462389 - 2021-12-14
COURT OF APPEALS
are required to specify the objectives of the sentence on the record.” State v. Gallion, 2004 WI 42, ¶40, 270
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55649 - 2010-10-18
are required to specify the objectives of the sentence on the record.” State v. Gallion, 2004 WI 42, ¶40, 270
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55649 - 2010-10-18
COURT OF APPEALS
required by Wis. Stat. § 980.09(1) and a review of the entire record as required by § 980.09(2), the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87423 - 2012-09-24
required by Wis. Stat. § 980.09(1) and a review of the entire record as required by § 980.09(2), the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87423 - 2012-09-24
CA Blank Order
not responded to the current no-merit report. After our independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129294 - 2014-11-16
not responded to the current no-merit report. After our independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129294 - 2014-11-16
[PDF]
State v. Christopher A. Cody
discretion. See State v. Mosley, 201 Wis. 2d 36, 43, 547 N.W.2d 806 (Ct. App. 1996). The record must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15661 - 2017-09-21
discretion. See State v. Mosley, 201 Wis. 2d 36, 43, 547 N.W.2d 806 (Ct. App. 1996). The record must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15661 - 2017-09-21
State v. Cashonda R. Pouewells
there. It further noted that utilities for the house were under the name of Marie Fisher, but that police records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6792 - 2005-03-31
there. It further noted that utilities for the house were under the name of Marie Fisher, but that police records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6792 - 2005-03-31
Susan Bauer v. Village of DeForest
award is a small portion of DeForest’s legal expenses in the action. The record shows that Bauer has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4132 - 2005-03-31
award is a small portion of DeForest’s legal expenses in the action. The record shows that Bauer has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4132 - 2005-03-31
State v. Patricia L. Karch
an individual. This form is the creation of the hospital, not the legislature. As is clear from the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9201 - 2005-03-31
an individual. This form is the creation of the hospital, not the legislature. As is clear from the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9201 - 2005-03-31