Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36671 - 36680 of 66410 for motion to dismiss.
Search results 36671 - 36680 of 66410 for motion to dismiss.
[PDF]
State v. Craig Damaske
¶1 PER CURIAM. Craig Damaske appeals from the order denying his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15886 - 2017-09-21
¶1 PER CURIAM. Craig Damaske appeals from the order denying his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15886 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
. CHRISTENSON, Judge. Affirmed; motion for frivolous appeal costs denied. Before Curley, P.J., Wedemeyer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31873 - 2014-09-15
. CHRISTENSON, Judge. Affirmed; motion for frivolous appeal costs denied. Before Curley, P.J., Wedemeyer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31873 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
conduct after a no contest plea. Kelly also appeals from the order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138312 - 2015-03-31
conduct after a no contest plea. Kelly also appeals from the order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138312 - 2015-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Daymon D. Tate
., Schudson and Curley, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Daymon D. Tate appeals from an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6148 - 2017-09-19
., Schudson and Curley, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Daymon D. Tate appeals from an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6148 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
filed a motion to invoke the doctrine of forfeiture by wrongdoing in the event Grace Hawthorne did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96201 - 2013-05-06
filed a motion to invoke the doctrine of forfeiture by wrongdoing in the event Grace Hawthorne did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96201 - 2013-05-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
complaint was filed, the State filed a motion to invoke the doctrine of forfeiture by wrongdoing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96201 - 2014-09-15
complaint was filed, the State filed a motion to invoke the doctrine of forfeiture by wrongdoing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96201 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
, which denied his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2011-12)[1] motion without a hearing. Stamps had alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94192 - 2013-03-18
, which denied his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2011-12)[1] motion without a hearing. Stamps had alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94192 - 2013-03-18
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Jonathan L. Rausch appeals pro se from a circuit court order that denied his postconviction motion filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49241 - 2014-09-15
. Jonathan L. Rausch appeals pro se from a circuit court order that denied his postconviction motion filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49241 - 2014-09-15
State v. James L. Holloway
), 939.63 and 939.05, Stats. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion for a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8115 - 2005-03-31
), 939.63 and 939.05, Stats. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion for a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8115 - 2005-03-31
State v. William L. Morford
the order granting the State’s motion for reconsideration and committing him as a sexually violent person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4377 - 2005-03-31
the order granting the State’s motion for reconsideration and committing him as a sexually violent person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4377 - 2005-03-31