Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36681 - 36690 of 62261 for child support.
Search results 36681 - 36690 of 62261 for child support.
Daniel J. Lenhart v. Robert L. Kisting
the version supporting their respective theory of the case. We summarily reject the Lenharts’ claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11979 - 2005-03-31
the version supporting their respective theory of the case. We summarily reject the Lenharts’ claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11979 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and their relationship to the primary sentencing factors is not supported by a review of the record. Rather
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147680 - 2017-09-21
and their relationship to the primary sentencing factors is not supported by a review of the record. Rather
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147680 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
claim is conclusory and without the requisite factual support necessary to show that Edward Hervey’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104257 - 2013-11-18
claim is conclusory and without the requisite factual support necessary to show that Edward Hervey’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104257 - 2013-11-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in the gas station parking lot. ¶4 In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79931 - 2014-09-15
in the gas station parking lot. ¶4 In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79931 - 2014-09-15
State v. Robert A. Cairns
results. We also conclude that the record supports the trial court’s finding that Cairns made a timely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2871 - 2005-03-31
results. We also conclude that the record supports the trial court’s finding that Cairns made a timely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2871 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mark Anthony Kelley
and Kelley’s motion failed to provide sufficient facts to support the remaining allegations. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12542 - 2005-03-31
and Kelley’s motion failed to provide sufficient facts to support the remaining allegations. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12542 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for treatment.” In light of the foregoing, a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence supporting
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161304 - 2017-09-21
for treatment.” In light of the foregoing, a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence supporting
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161304 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that did not support probable cause: no erratic driving, no odor of burnt marijuana emanating from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119189 - 2014-09-15
that did not support probable cause: no erratic driving, no odor of burnt marijuana emanating from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119189 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Mark Anthony Kelley
penalty of nineteen years and Kelley’s motion failed to provide sufficient facts to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12542 - 2017-09-21
penalty of nineteen years and Kelley’s motion failed to provide sufficient facts to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12542 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in law or equity and could not be supported by a good faith argument for an extension, modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=126353 - 2017-09-21
in law or equity and could not be supported by a good faith argument for an extension, modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=126353 - 2017-09-21