Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36681 - 36690 of 58425 for speedy trial.
Search results 36681 - 36690 of 58425 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
granted a hearing on the postconviction motion. Both Burris and trial counsel testified. The circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107714 - 2014-02-03
granted a hearing on the postconviction motion. Both Burris and trial counsel testified. The circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107714 - 2014-02-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, Hiller argues that his letter was not a postconviction motion, and simply asked the trial court how
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189802 - 2017-09-21
, Hiller argues that his letter was not a postconviction motion, and simply asked the trial court how
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189802 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2018AP1640 3 will not reverse the trial court’s factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250466 - 2019-11-27
. No. 2018AP1640 3 will not reverse the trial court’s factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250466 - 2019-11-27
Timothy J. Weiss v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
. Affirmed. Before Vergeront, Roggensack and Deininger, JJ. PER CURIAM. Timothy Weiss appeals a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15064 - 2005-03-31
. Affirmed. Before Vergeront, Roggensack and Deininger, JJ. PER CURIAM. Timothy Weiss appeals a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15064 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Donna Welch v. William J. Plein
should not have been granted in favor of State Farm, and remand to the trial court to determine when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10471 - 2017-09-20
should not have been granted in favor of State Farm, and remand to the trial court to determine when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10471 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
that he had received ineffective assistance of trial counsel because, among other things, his counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34032 - 2014-09-15
that he had received ineffective assistance of trial counsel because, among other things, his counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34032 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Michael P. D'Angelo
in the trial court, but the trial court refused to consider the matter. Consequently, D’Angelo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2316 - 2017-09-19
in the trial court, but the trial court refused to consider the matter. Consequently, D’Angelo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2316 - 2017-09-19
State v. Calvin Shields
uphold the trial court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. See State v. Richardson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15493 - 2005-03-31
uphold the trial court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. See State v. Richardson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15493 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that he had received ineffective assistance of trial counsel because, among other things, his counsel had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34032 - 2008-09-15
that he had received ineffective assistance of trial counsel because, among other things, his counsel had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34032 - 2008-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
to seek appellate review of the trial court’s reopening of the judgment of dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32829 - 2008-05-27
to seek appellate review of the trial court’s reopening of the judgment of dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32829 - 2008-05-27