Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36691 - 36700 of 65281 for divorce records/1000.

[PDF] State v. Kenneth D. Paulson
Paulson acknowledged on the record. In response to further questions from the court, Paulson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14598 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
upon our review of the briefs No. 2022AP1714-CR 2 and Record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=789591 - 2024-04-17

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Tammi Daniel, Dr. Guinn, Anna, and Mia. The State also played recorded forensic interviews of Anna
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1098837 - 2026-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of that charge. 2 At the postconviction motion hearing, the record was clarified to establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175025 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Timothy M. Secrist
. The district attorney urges us to affirm based on facts not supported by the record. 2 In a memorandum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12944 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Jalaina M.F. v. Blake W.A.
.2d 85, 88 (Ct. App. 1996). Thus, if the record contains any credible evidence that, under any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13350 - 2017-09-21

State v. Aaron C. Tuomi
supervisor. However, there is no record of the motorist’s name or other identification, or any indication
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5472 - 2005-03-31

Brown County Department of Human Services v. Stephenie Ann T.H.
Extraneous information is information that is neither of record nor within the jurors’ general knowledge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6155 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
, there was not a sufficient factual basis to support that Gierczak obstructed an officer because the record did not establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90589 - 2012-12-12

State v. Michael R. Caspersen
the record, the hearing was not held. The court then “directed that counsel for the defendant contact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4920 - 2005-03-31