Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36691 - 36700 of 82447 for judgment for m s.
Search results 36691 - 36700 of 82447 for judgment for m s.
Eugene Hafner v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane County: Daniel l. la rocque, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2304 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane County: Daniel l. la rocque, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2304 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
. MICHAEL S. MACK, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment and an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41391 - 2014-09-15
. MICHAEL S. MACK, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment and an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41391 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Anthony Liggins
, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from judgments and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2223 - 2017-09-19
, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from judgments and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2223 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
City of Madison v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
grant the petition upon a showing that the petitioner's interest meets the requirements of s. 803.09
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17484 - 2017-09-21
grant the petition upon a showing that the petitioner's interest meets the requirements of s. 803.09
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17484 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
, V. MARK H. LINDERT, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29587 - 2014-09-15
, V. MARK H. LINDERT, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29587 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Calumet County: JEFFREY S. FROEHLICH, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=968545 - 2025-06-11
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Calumet County: JEFFREY S. FROEHLICH, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=968545 - 2025-06-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: MARK A. SANDERS and STEPHANIE ROTHSTEIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=456081 - 2021-11-23
a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: MARK A. SANDERS and STEPHANIE ROTHSTEIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=456081 - 2021-11-23
[PDF]
State v. Aaron Leslie Harmer
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for St. Croix County: SCOTT R. NEEDHAM, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2155 - 2017-09-19
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for St. Croix County: SCOTT R. NEEDHAM, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2155 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Ozaukee County: STEVEN MICHAEL CAIN, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=581670 - 2022-10-26
a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Ozaukee County: STEVEN MICHAEL CAIN, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=581670 - 2022-10-26
[PDF]
Eugene Hafner v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
them “member[s]” of the CSRS on the crucial date. We disagree, and affirm the judgment. I. Scope
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2304 - 2017-09-19
them “member[s]” of the CSRS on the crucial date. We disagree, and affirm the judgment. I. Scope
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2304 - 2017-09-19