Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36701 - 36710 of 58277 for speedy trial.
Search results 36701 - 36710 of 58277 for speedy trial.
State v. Demitrius Jackson
from the trial testimony of two members of the Milwaukee Police Department. The police received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24979 - 2006-05-01
from the trial testimony of two members of the Milwaukee Police Department. The police received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24979 - 2006-05-01
[PDF]
Michael G. Plourde v. Jeffrey W. Guettinger
, N.A., and its lawyers. The trial court dismissed the lawsuit, No. 97-1624 2 ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12579 - 2017-09-21
, N.A., and its lawyers. The trial court dismissed the lawsuit, No. 97-1624 2 ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12579 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, he saw that it “did cross the white fog line.” There was a videotape of the incident and the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61344 - 2011-03-22
, he saw that it “did cross the white fog line.” There was a videotape of the incident and the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61344 - 2011-03-22
Raymond Ludwikowski v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
that Raymond Ludwikowski's claim for loss of earning capacity is premature.[1] The trial court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9421 - 2014-08-11
that Raymond Ludwikowski's claim for loss of earning capacity is premature.[1] The trial court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9421 - 2014-08-11
State v. James M. Pirk
a defense was violated by an evidentiary ruling. We conclude that the trial court properly excluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11201 - 2005-03-31
a defense was violated by an evidentiary ruling. We conclude that the trial court properly excluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11201 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Gregory T. Ross v. Specialty Risk Consultants, Inc.
was not addressed by the trial court. We therefore reverse the summary foreclosure judgment and remand to permit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2134 - 2017-09-19
was not addressed by the trial court. We therefore reverse the summary foreclosure judgment and remand to permit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2134 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Frontsheet
sufficient facts so as to entitle him to an evidentiary hearing on his claim that his trial counsel
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=526407 - 2022-05-26
sufficient facts so as to entitle him to an evidentiary hearing on his claim that his trial counsel
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=526407 - 2022-05-26
[PDF]
Karen Wipperfurth v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System
Wipperfurth and Bernadette Keul. The trial court granted plaintiffs’ motions for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11968 - 2017-09-21
Wipperfurth and Bernadette Keul. The trial court granted plaintiffs’ motions for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11968 - 2017-09-21
Leon M. Reyes v. Greatway Insurance Company
for injuries to the victim of a drive-by shooting. We reverse the trial court’s ruling to the contrary. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12561 - 2005-03-31
for injuries to the victim of a drive-by shooting. We reverse the trial court’s ruling to the contrary. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12561 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the State’s case-in-chief, Anderson entered an Alford guilty plea to both counts, but continued to trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100886 - 2013-08-14
the State’s case-in-chief, Anderson entered an Alford guilty plea to both counts, but continued to trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100886 - 2013-08-14