Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36721 - 36730 of 55089 for n c.

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
Electronic Notice N. E. G. Brendan John McEntegart Electronic Notice You are hereby
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=990110 - 2025-07-30

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
Electronic Notice N. E. G. Brendan John McEntegart Electronic Notice You are hereby
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=990110 - 2025-07-30

COURT OF APPEALS
Justice Code.” Id., ¶3 n.3 (quoting Wis. Stat. § 938.02(10m) (2001–02)). The Code states in pertinent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31769 - 2008-02-11

COURT OF APPEALS
; and the vicious or aggravated nature of the crime. Id., ¶43 n.11. ¶8 Westlund again asserts that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49040 - 2010-04-20

COURT OF APPEALS
. Stat. § 968.22. That section provides that “[n]o evidence seized under a search warrant shall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33011 - 2008-06-11

COURT OF APPEALS
information that should have been provided at the plea hearing. State v. Hoppe, 2009 WI 41, ¶44 n.26, 317 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65362 - 2011-06-07

COURT OF APPEALS
of the officers amount to an unlawful “showup.” Jarosinski relies upon State v. Dubose, 2005 WI 126, ¶1 n.1, 285
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30473 - 2007-10-02

State v. Larry D. Hicks
a living room window to the home located at 3534 N. 24th Place, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, which he owned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18372 - 2005-06-06

COURT OF APPEALS
does not decide which it finds the more persuasive.” Id. “[I]n order to provide a basis for probable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31476 - 2008-01-14

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, 266-72, 389 N.W.2d 12 (1986); State v. Krieger, 163 Wis. 2d 241, 249-51 & n.6, 471 N.W.2d 599 (Ct
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185880 - 2017-09-21