Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36721 - 36730 of 84463 for simple case search.
Search results 36721 - 36730 of 84463 for simple case search.
State v. Brad A. Raddeman
2000 WI App 190 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2157 - 2005-03-31
2000 WI App 190 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2157 - 2005-03-31
Conrad L. Aichele and Amanda L. Aichele v. Clark County
to determine whether they establish a prima facie case for summary judgment. Id. If they do, we look
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15973 - 2005-03-31
to determine whether they establish a prima facie case for summary judgment. Id. If they do, we look
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15973 - 2005-03-31
Maria Fish v. Hartmut Langenstroer
, 590, 139 N.W.2d 635 (1966). We do not agree that the King case controls here. ¶4 First
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5142 - 2005-03-31
, 590, 139 N.W.2d 635 (1966). We do not agree that the King case controls here. ¶4 First
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5142 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). In this divorce case, Randall J. Kuenzi appeals a circuit court order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1098423 - 2026-04-02
in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). In this divorce case, Randall J. Kuenzi appeals a circuit court order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1098423 - 2026-04-02
David Burch v. Village of Hammond
. City of Tigard, 512 U.S. 374 (1994), should apply here. In Dolan, a case dealing with Fifth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5947 - 2005-03-31
. City of Tigard, 512 U.S. 374 (1994), should apply here. In Dolan, a case dealing with Fifth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5947 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the criteria for a “contested case” with the right to a hearing). The Board’s order and an attached notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1132824 - 2026-06-16
the criteria for a “contested case” with the right to a hearing). The Board’s order and an attached notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1132824 - 2026-06-16
[PDF]
NOTICE
discretion in denying a mistrial, we affirm the judgment. ¶2 Williams was originally charged in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51299 - 2014-09-15
discretion in denying a mistrial, we affirm the judgment. ¶2 Williams was originally charged in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51299 - 2014-09-15
State v. David G. Adler
the statute. However, we conclude that under the facts of this case, the arresting officer prevented Adler
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12245 - 2005-03-31
the statute. However, we conclude that under the facts of this case, the arresting officer prevented Adler
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12245 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Douglas E. Howk, Jr.
Although Judge John R. Race entered the judgment in this case, Judge Robert J. Kennedy issued the ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6972 - 2017-09-20
Although Judge John R. Race entered the judgment in this case, Judge Robert J. Kennedy issued the ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6972 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Gregory C. Royal v. Sara Seehafer
in this case arose out of an encounter between the appellant and Sara Seehafer when they were living next
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3203 - 2017-09-19
in this case arose out of an encounter between the appellant and Sara Seehafer when they were living next
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3203 - 2017-09-19