Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36731 - 36740 of 46280 for adult name change.

2007 WI APP 260
and gave her a copy of the declaration. ¶8 The Andersons filed this suit in March 2005. They named
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30950 - 2005-03-31

WI App 59 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP1995-CR Complete Title...
modification, namely, that “[c]ontrary to the court’s understanding at sentencing, Mr. Armstrong was entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110178 - 2008-06-02

[PDF] WI 58
to us, he could just change them again. The Governor has fought this case at every step of the way
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=376845 - 2021-08-02

COURT OF APPEALS
evidence would not have changed the outcome of the trial. B. Lowe Failed to Demonstrate Ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102038 - 2013-09-17

State v. Mark E. Nelson
. § 944.205, and one of the changes was the addition of this language to subsec. (2)(a): “while that person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25275 - 2006-06-27

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
evidence would not have changed the outcome of the trial. B. Lowe Failed to Demonstrate Ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102038 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Response to Omnibus Petition (WEC)
census results show population changes in different geographic areas, but otherwise ALLEGE that those
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/respomnibuswec.pdf - 2021-10-28

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - October 2021
: The Supreme Court calendar may change between the time you receive it and when a case is heard
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=435981 - 2021-10-13

[PDF] State v. William J. Church
the State changed its position and conceded multiplicity. See State v. Church, 2000 WI 90, 236 Wis. 2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16569 - 2017-09-21

State v. David Arredondo
] wants to reserve the right to change that after these two witnesses testify. Is that right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5626 - 2005-03-31