Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36731 - 36740 of 82984 for case codes/1000.
Search results 36731 - 36740 of 82984 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Ernest J.P., Jr.
the statute, which does not purport to dictate how the county must prove its case for recommitment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7128 - 2017-09-20
the statute, which does not purport to dictate how the county must prove its case for recommitment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7128 - 2017-09-20
State v. Ray A. Hampton
to a plea agreement, he had pled guilty to armed robbery for his participation in the case. Hampton
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11484 - 2005-03-31
to a plea agreement, he had pled guilty to armed robbery for his participation in the case. Hampton
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11484 - 2005-03-31
WI App 124 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP2538 Complete Title...
2013 WI App 124 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP2538 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101938 - 2013-10-29
2013 WI App 124 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP2538 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101938 - 2013-10-29
State v. Daniel Slaughter
. Slaughter raises three issues. First, as in his previous appeal in this case, he claims the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13622 - 2005-03-31
. Slaughter raises three issues. First, as in his previous appeal in this case, he claims the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13622 - 2005-03-31
State v. Sean P. Tate
the trial of his case, would have the right to retry the issue of the principal’s guilt. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13716 - 2005-03-31
the trial of his case, would have the right to retry the issue of the principal’s guilt. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13716 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. We reject Gilbert’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=353433 - 2021-04-06
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. We reject Gilbert’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=353433 - 2021-04-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
interests of the juvenile or of the public” for the case to be heard in juvenile court. WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=407659 - 2021-08-11
interests of the juvenile or of the public” for the case to be heard in juvenile court. WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=407659 - 2021-08-11
COURT OF APPEALS
and that pertaining to the remaining count; and (3) the strength of the case on the remaining count. Id. at 379-80. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86696 - 2012-09-04
and that pertaining to the remaining count; and (3) the strength of the case on the remaining count. Id. at 379-80. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86696 - 2012-09-04
State v. Mark D. O'Kray
As noted above, the dispositive issue in this case is whether O’Kray’s plea was knowingly and voluntarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12175 - 2005-03-31
As noted above, the dispositive issue in this case is whether O’Kray’s plea was knowingly and voluntarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12175 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
’ favor was entitled to full faith and credit. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70365 - 2011-08-30
’ favor was entitled to full faith and credit. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70365 - 2011-08-30