Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36731 - 36740 of 65281 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 36731 - 36740 of 65281 for divorce records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of restitution. After reviewing the record, we No. 2018AP747 2 conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261083 - 2020-05-19
of restitution. After reviewing the record, we No. 2018AP747 2 conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261083 - 2020-05-19
State v. Charles Brown
. At the plea hearing, Brown’s counsel explained the purposes of the plea agreement on the record: What we have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7011 - 2005-03-31
. At the plea hearing, Brown’s counsel explained the purposes of the plea agreement on the record: What we have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7011 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
-revocation record does not reflect the sentencing judge’s awareness of the information in the presentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36732 - 2009-06-08
-revocation record does not reflect the sentencing judge’s awareness of the information in the presentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36732 - 2009-06-08
State v. George C. Harrell
the corrections to the PSI presented by Harrell’s counsel at the time Harrell was sentenced. The record thus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4205 - 2005-03-31
the corrections to the PSI presented by Harrell’s counsel at the time Harrell was sentenced. The record thus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4205 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s exercise of discretion, we examine the record to determine whether the court logically interpreted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64800 - 2011-05-31
court’s exercise of discretion, we examine the record to determine whether the court logically interpreted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64800 - 2011-05-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Dinter’s testimony was based on “possibly inaccurate assertions” about the Record, and was simply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130180 - 2014-11-24
Dinter’s testimony was based on “possibly inaccurate assertions” about the Record, and was simply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130180 - 2014-11-24
COURT OF APPEALS
to raise a question of fact, or if the record conclusively demonstrates the defendant is not entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117675 - 2014-07-22
to raise a question of fact, or if the record conclusively demonstrates the defendant is not entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117675 - 2014-07-22
State v. Donald G. Kester
its discretion in accordance with acceptable legal standards and the facts of record. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11168 - 2005-03-31
its discretion in accordance with acceptable legal standards and the facts of record. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11168 - 2005-03-31
State v. Henry A. Phillips
of the record, this court is satisfied that the colloquy into Phillips' understanding of the meaning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13887 - 2005-03-31
of the record, this court is satisfied that the colloquy into Phillips' understanding of the meaning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13887 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Silvester B. Donoe
motion without a hearing when the motion on its face shows no basis for relief, or if the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26472 - 2017-09-21
motion without a hearing when the motion on its face shows no basis for relief, or if the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26472 - 2017-09-21