Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36741 - 36750 of 82982 for case codes/1000.
Search results 36741 - 36750 of 82982 for case codes/1000.
State v. Daniel Slaughter
. Slaughter raises three issues. First, as in his previous appeal in this case, he claims the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13622 - 2005-03-31
. Slaughter raises three issues. First, as in his previous appeal in this case, he claims the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13622 - 2005-03-31
State v. Sean P. Tate
the trial of his case, would have the right to retry the issue of the principal’s guilt. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13716 - 2005-03-31
the trial of his case, would have the right to retry the issue of the principal’s guilt. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13716 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. We reject Gilbert’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=353433 - 2021-04-06
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. We reject Gilbert’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=353433 - 2021-04-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
interests of the juvenile or of the public” for the case to be heard in juvenile court. WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=407659 - 2021-08-11
interests of the juvenile or of the public” for the case to be heard in juvenile court. WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=407659 - 2021-08-11
COURT OF APPEALS
and that pertaining to the remaining count; and (3) the strength of the case on the remaining count. Id. at 379-80. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86696 - 2012-09-04
and that pertaining to the remaining count; and (3) the strength of the case on the remaining count. Id. at 379-80. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86696 - 2012-09-04
State v. Mark D. O'Kray
As noted above, the dispositive issue in this case is whether O’Kray’s plea was knowingly and voluntarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12175 - 2005-03-31
As noted above, the dispositive issue in this case is whether O’Kray’s plea was knowingly and voluntarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12175 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
’ favor was entitled to full faith and credit. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70365 - 2011-08-30
’ favor was entitled to full faith and credit. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70365 - 2011-08-30
COURT OF APPEALS
bargain, Dubose resolved the case by pleading guilty to a reduced charge of second-degree reckless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143202 - 2015-06-22
bargain, Dubose resolved the case by pleading guilty to a reduced charge of second-degree reckless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143202 - 2015-06-22
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112478 - 2014-05-12
review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112478 - 2014-05-12
COURT OF APPEALS
think he could win the case.” Williams also contended he did not understand the plea offer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50883 - 2010-06-15
think he could win the case.” Williams also contended he did not understand the plea offer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50883 - 2010-06-15